"I think complexity is mostly sort of crummy stuff that is there because it's too expensive to change the interface"
About this Quote
Lanier lands a grenade in the middle of tech’s favorite self-flattery: the idea that complexity signals sophistication. By calling complexity “crummy stuff,” he refuses the reverent tone designers and engineers often use to sanctify messy products. The real villain, in his framing, isn’t the user who “doesn’t get it” or the world’s inherent difficulty; it’s an economic decision dressed up as inevitability.
The line “because it’s too expensive to change the interface” is the tell. Lanier isn’t describing complexity as a natural byproduct of powerful systems, but as deferred maintenance, a debt the user is forced to pay in confusion, friction, and time. It’s a critique of how organizations treat interfaces as branding surfaces rather than moral commitments. Changing an interface costs money, risks alienating existing users, and demands cross-team coordination. So companies keep accreting features, toggles, menus, and exceptions. Complexity becomes a kind of institutional laziness with a glossy FAQ.
As an artist, Lanier’s intent is also aesthetic: interface design is a cultural object, not just a tool. Cluttered systems don’t merely frustrate; they shape how people think, what they believe is “normal,” and how much agency they feel they have inside machines. The subtext is quietly accusatory: if a product feels confusing, it may be because someone decided your attention was cheaper than their redesign.
In a moment when software mediates everything from work to dating to government services, Lanier’s jab reads less like a UX note and more like a political claim about who absorbs the costs of modern life.
The line “because it’s too expensive to change the interface” is the tell. Lanier isn’t describing complexity as a natural byproduct of powerful systems, but as deferred maintenance, a debt the user is forced to pay in confusion, friction, and time. It’s a critique of how organizations treat interfaces as branding surfaces rather than moral commitments. Changing an interface costs money, risks alienating existing users, and demands cross-team coordination. So companies keep accreting features, toggles, menus, and exceptions. Complexity becomes a kind of institutional laziness with a glossy FAQ.
As an artist, Lanier’s intent is also aesthetic: interface design is a cultural object, not just a tool. Cluttered systems don’t merely frustrate; they shape how people think, what they believe is “normal,” and how much agency they feel they have inside machines. The subtext is quietly accusatory: if a product feels confusing, it may be because someone decided your attention was cheaper than their redesign.
In a moment when software mediates everything from work to dating to government services, Lanier’s jab reads less like a UX note and more like a political claim about who absorbs the costs of modern life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Jaron
Add to List
