"I think Hillary and Bill are really liberals at heart. I think that, in addition to being liberals, they are very practical. They have made some decisions about what it takes to win"
About this Quote
Waters is doing what seasoned party figures do best: laundering ambition into ideology without pretending the two are enemies. By insisting the Clintons are "really liberals at heart", she offers the base an emotional reassurance, a kind of authenticity certificate, even as she concedes the very thing purists most resent: their tactical flexibility. The key word is "practical" - an elegant euphemism in political speech that can mean compromise, triangulation, or simply reading polls with religious devotion.
The line "what it takes to win" is where the subtext hardens. Winning becomes the moral alibi. If the Clintons have disappointed progressives, Waters implies, it's because power is the prerequisite for any progressive outcome. That argument doesn't ask you to like the compromises; it asks you to respect the scoreboard. Waters isn't defending every decision so much as defending the governing theory behind them: that you can't legislate from a losing campaign.
Context matters here. Waters, a reliably liberal voice and a surrogate with credibility among Black voters and movement-aligned Democrats, is positioned as a translator between factions. She frames the Clintons as liberals who speak fluent institutional politics, a pairing meant to soothe anxieties about centrism while acknowledging the brutal incentives of national elections. It's a compact lesson in how Democrats manage internal contradiction: promise the heart, justify the hands.
The line "what it takes to win" is where the subtext hardens. Winning becomes the moral alibi. If the Clintons have disappointed progressives, Waters implies, it's because power is the prerequisite for any progressive outcome. That argument doesn't ask you to like the compromises; it asks you to respect the scoreboard. Waters isn't defending every decision so much as defending the governing theory behind them: that you can't legislate from a losing campaign.
Context matters here. Waters, a reliably liberal voice and a surrogate with credibility among Black voters and movement-aligned Democrats, is positioned as a translator between factions. She frames the Clintons as liberals who speak fluent institutional politics, a pairing meant to soothe anxieties about centrism while acknowledging the brutal incentives of national elections. It's a compact lesson in how Democrats manage internal contradiction: promise the heart, justify the hands.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Maxine
Add to List


