"I think I avoid stepping into sentimentality by trying to be as truthful as possible with performances"
About this Quote
Sentimentality is the easiest drug a director can push: swelling music, moist close-ups, a plot engineered to wring tears on cue. Hallstrom, a filmmaker often associated with warm, humanist stories, is naming the tightrope walk at the center of that tradition. His claim isn’t that emotion is the enemy; it’s that emotion becomes cheap the moment it’s performed for the audience rather than lived by the character.
The key word is “truthful,” and he locates that truth specifically in performance. That’s a quietly radical emphasis in an era where “authenticity” is often discussed as a matter of subject matter (based on a true story, ripped from the headlines) or style (handheld cameras, natural light). Hallstrom is talking about the microeconomy of feeling: a breath held too long, a glance that arrives a beat early, a line delivered with the actor’s intention rather than the character’s need. Those are the telltale signs of sentimentality, not because they’re emotional, but because they’re strategic.
There’s also an implicit defense here. Directors who traffic in tenderness are routinely accused of being “sappy,” as if empathy itself is an aesthetic flaw. Hallstrom reframes the critique: the problem isn’t softness, it’s falseness. The subtext is craft as moral discipline. If you stay faithful to what a person would actually do in that moment - messy, contradictory, sometimes uncinematic - the emotion earns its impact. If you chase the effect, you get the Hallmark aftertaste.
Contextually, it’s a statement from a director whose best work depends on actors making big feelings look like ordinary behavior, so the audience believes the heart before it feels it.
The key word is “truthful,” and he locates that truth specifically in performance. That’s a quietly radical emphasis in an era where “authenticity” is often discussed as a matter of subject matter (based on a true story, ripped from the headlines) or style (handheld cameras, natural light). Hallstrom is talking about the microeconomy of feeling: a breath held too long, a glance that arrives a beat early, a line delivered with the actor’s intention rather than the character’s need. Those are the telltale signs of sentimentality, not because they’re emotional, but because they’re strategic.
There’s also an implicit defense here. Directors who traffic in tenderness are routinely accused of being “sappy,” as if empathy itself is an aesthetic flaw. Hallstrom reframes the critique: the problem isn’t softness, it’s falseness. The subtext is craft as moral discipline. If you stay faithful to what a person would actually do in that moment - messy, contradictory, sometimes uncinematic - the emotion earns its impact. If you chase the effect, you get the Hallmark aftertaste.
Contextually, it’s a statement from a director whose best work depends on actors making big feelings look like ordinary behavior, so the audience believes the heart before it feels it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Lasse
Add to List





