"I think I would say 'The King's Speech' is surprisingly funny, in fact the audiences in London, Toronto, LA, New York commented there's more laughter in this film than in most comedies, while it is also a moving tear-jerker with an uplifting ending"
About this Quote
Hooper’s sales pitch is sneakier than it looks: he’s reframing prestige drama as a crowd-pleaser without forfeiting its cultural capital. Calling The King’s Speech “surprisingly funny” isn’t just a tonal note, it’s a defensive maneuver against the assumption that royal trauma plus historical setting equals worthy-but-dull. The word “surprisingly” flatters the audience’s skepticism, then converts it into a discovery they can feel smart about.
The roll call of cities does double duty. London and Toronto signal legitimacy (home turf and festival imprimatur), while LA and New York imply the film can play to both industry tastemakers and urban arbiters of taste. It’s soft box-office strategy disguised as reportage: laughter is presented as empirical proof, a social contagion you’ll want to join.
Then comes the neat braid of “moving tear-jerker” and “uplifting ending,” a promise of emotional range that also reassures viewers they won’t be left in the bleak. The subtext is as much about branding as craft: this isn’t a museum piece; it’s an experience with beats you recognize from populist storytelling, only wrapped in period tailoring.
In context, it reads like an answer to the late-2000s/early-2010s awards ecosystem, where films had to be “important” yet accessible. Hooper positions the movie as an antidote to the self-serious prestige template: you can cry, you can laugh, and you can leave feeling improved, not punished.
The roll call of cities does double duty. London and Toronto signal legitimacy (home turf and festival imprimatur), while LA and New York imply the film can play to both industry tastemakers and urban arbiters of taste. It’s soft box-office strategy disguised as reportage: laughter is presented as empirical proof, a social contagion you’ll want to join.
Then comes the neat braid of “moving tear-jerker” and “uplifting ending,” a promise of emotional range that also reassures viewers they won’t be left in the bleak. The subtext is as much about branding as craft: this isn’t a museum piece; it’s an experience with beats you recognize from populist storytelling, only wrapped in period tailoring.
In context, it reads like an answer to the late-2000s/early-2010s awards ecosystem, where films had to be “important” yet accessible. Hooper positions the movie as an antidote to the self-serious prestige template: you can cry, you can laugh, and you can leave feeling improved, not punished.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List






