"I think I'm a good Canadian, but I'm not the greatest Canadian"
About this Quote
There’s a practiced modesty in Don Cherry calling himself “a good Canadian” while refusing the crown of “the greatest,” and it lands because it’s doing two jobs at once: self-defense and self-mythmaking. Cherry, the bombastic hockey broadcaster who built a brand on blazers, patriotism, and plainspoken scolding, rarely spoke in half measures. So when he pulls back here, the restraint reads less like humility than like a savvy calibration of his public persona.
The intent is to claim legitimacy without inviting the kind of reverence that turns a cultural figure into a national symbol - and, crucially, without opening himself up to being tested against that impossible standard. “Good Canadian” is a flexible credential: it signals loyalty, tradition, maybe a certain blue-collar moral code. “Greatest Canadian” is a referendum, and Cherry’s career attracted referendums like a magnet. His on-air identity hinged on dividing lines: real fans vs. elites, “our” values vs. theirs, soldiers and workers vs. the supposedly soft. Declining the superlative lets him keep the pose of the straight-talking patriot while sidestepping the inevitable question: whose Canada?
The subtext is that Canadian identity is both brand and battleground. Cherry’s nationalism was never neutral; it was performative, combative, and often exclusionary, which made him beloved and embattled in equal measure. By framing himself as merely “good,” he sounds relatable, even reasonable - while still planting a flag in the center of the argument about what “good” is supposed to mean.
The intent is to claim legitimacy without inviting the kind of reverence that turns a cultural figure into a national symbol - and, crucially, without opening himself up to being tested against that impossible standard. “Good Canadian” is a flexible credential: it signals loyalty, tradition, maybe a certain blue-collar moral code. “Greatest Canadian” is a referendum, and Cherry’s career attracted referendums like a magnet. His on-air identity hinged on dividing lines: real fans vs. elites, “our” values vs. theirs, soldiers and workers vs. the supposedly soft. Declining the superlative lets him keep the pose of the straight-talking patriot while sidestepping the inevitable question: whose Canada?
The subtext is that Canadian identity is both brand and battleground. Cherry’s nationalism was never neutral; it was performative, combative, and often exclusionary, which made him beloved and embattled in equal measure. By framing himself as merely “good,” he sounds relatable, even reasonable - while still planting a flag in the center of the argument about what “good” is supposed to mean.
Quote Details
| Topic | Humility |
|---|
More Quotes by Donald
Add to List



