"I think it is totally wrong and terribly harmful if education is defined as acquiring knowledge"
About this Quote
Glasser lobs a polite grenade at one of modern society's most comfortable myths: that schooling is a storage problem. His line works because it sounds almost heretical while naming an everyday experience students and teachers rarely get to say out loud: you can memorize your way through a system and still be functionally uneducated. The target isn't knowledge itself, but the definition of education as mere acquisition - the model where minds are treated like empty hard drives and success is measured by how much content can be downloaded before the test.
The specific intent is reformist, even therapeutic. As a psychologist, Glasser is pushing against an industrial-era classroom logic that rewards compliance, ranking, and short-term recall, then calls the result "learning". The subtext is that this definition isn't neutral; it's "terribly harmful" because it reduces people to performers of information, not makers of meaning. It encourages credentialism over competence, anxiety over curiosity, and external motivation (grades, approval, fear) over internal motivation (interest, purpose, agency) - themes consistent with his broader work on choice theory and personal responsibility.
Context matters: Glasser wrote amid late-20th-century debates about schooling as workforce pipeline versus human development. His phrasing is intentionally absolute - "totally wrong" - because incremental tweaks don't fix a category error. Education, in his view, is closer to forming judgment, practicing skills, and learning how to relate to others than stacking facts. The sting is that a knowledge-only definition doesn't just fail; it teaches students the wrong lesson about what a mind is for.
The specific intent is reformist, even therapeutic. As a psychologist, Glasser is pushing against an industrial-era classroom logic that rewards compliance, ranking, and short-term recall, then calls the result "learning". The subtext is that this definition isn't neutral; it's "terribly harmful" because it reduces people to performers of information, not makers of meaning. It encourages credentialism over competence, anxiety over curiosity, and external motivation (grades, approval, fear) over internal motivation (interest, purpose, agency) - themes consistent with his broader work on choice theory and personal responsibility.
Context matters: Glasser wrote amid late-20th-century debates about schooling as workforce pipeline versus human development. His phrasing is intentionally absolute - "totally wrong" - because incremental tweaks don't fix a category error. Education, in his view, is closer to forming judgment, practicing skills, and learning how to relate to others than stacking facts. The sting is that a knowledge-only definition doesn't just fail; it teaches students the wrong lesson about what a mind is for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List







