"I think it's good for sporting justice that Ronaldo scored twice in the final"
About this Quote
The intent is deceptively simple: validate the final as fair, satisfying, and appropriately authored by its headline act. But the subtext is about narrative ownership. Finals are where reputations get sealed or complicated; a star can dominate a tournament and still be remembered for “disappearing” in the last act. By framing Ronaldo’s two goals as “justice,” Fontaine is pushing back against that gotcha culture. He’s also defending the sport’s aesthetic logic: the best players should tilt the climax, because that’s how football builds meaning across 90 minutes and across eras.
There’s an interesting tension embedded in the compliment. “Sporting justice” isn’t legal justice; it’s emotional bookkeeping for fans who want the game to reward excellence rather than randomness, refereeing controversy, or a single unlucky bounce. Fontaine’s choice of words quietly acknowledges how often finals don’t feel “fair” at all. Ronaldo scoring twice becomes a relief valve: the event aligns with expectation, the star confirms the myth, and the audience leaves with a story that makes sense.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Fontaine, Just. (2026, January 15). I think it's good for sporting justice that Ronaldo scored twice in the final. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-its-good-for-sporting-justice-that-160970/
Chicago Style
Fontaine, Just. "I think it's good for sporting justice that Ronaldo scored twice in the final." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-its-good-for-sporting-justice-that-160970/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I think it's good for sporting justice that Ronaldo scored twice in the final." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-its-good-for-sporting-justice-that-160970/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.


