"I think mine is the fullest and most plausible account of what went on in Marie Antoinette's life"
About this Quote
“I think” is doing heavy lifting here: a modest throat-clear that lets Antonia Fraser make a bold claim without sounding like she’s pounding the table. The phrase “fullest and most plausible” is the real flex, a two-part credential aimed at a field where biographies often split between maximalist detail and a “good story” that collapses under scrutiny. Fraser signals she’s offering both: breadth (the fullest) and interpretive discipline (the most plausible). Plausibility matters because Marie Antoinette is less a person in popular memory than a cultural Rorschach test, endlessly rewritten as monster, martyr, fashion plate, or feminist proxy. To promise plausibility is to promise resistance to myth.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to earlier accounts that were either prurient, polemical, or lazy with evidence. “What went on” sounds almost conversational, even slightly gossipy, but it’s also strategic: it gestures toward the machinery of court life, propaganda, and rumor that shaped her reputation as much as her actions did. Fraser isn’t just narrating a life; she’s adjudicating a case built from pamphlets, slanders, and political theater.
Contextually, this is the voice of a late-20th-century revisionist biographer pushing back against the caricature of the frivolous queen. The line stakes out a historian’s ethic in a celebrity-saturated subject: you can’t stop the legend, but you can outwork it, then dare the reader to trade familiar scandal for a messier, more human record.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to earlier accounts that were either prurient, polemical, or lazy with evidence. “What went on” sounds almost conversational, even slightly gossipy, but it’s also strategic: it gestures toward the machinery of court life, propaganda, and rumor that shaped her reputation as much as her actions did. Fraser isn’t just narrating a life; she’s adjudicating a case built from pamphlets, slanders, and political theater.
Contextually, this is the voice of a late-20th-century revisionist biographer pushing back against the caricature of the frivolous queen. The line stakes out a historian’s ethic in a celebrity-saturated subject: you can’t stop the legend, but you can outwork it, then dare the reader to trade familiar scandal for a messier, more human record.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Antonia
Add to List






