"I think one has to say it's not just simply a matter of capturing people and holding them accountable, but removing the sanctuaries, removing the support systems, ending states who sponsor terrorism. And that's why it has to be a broad and sustained campaign"
About this Quote
Wolfowitz’s phrasing is bureaucratic, but the ambition underneath it is sweeping: move the target from individual perpetrators to the entire ecosystem that makes them possible. “Not just simply” is the tell. It’s a softener that pretends to narrow the focus while actually widening the permissible field of action. Capturing “people” and “holding them accountable” reads like law enforcement; “removing the sanctuaries” and “ending states who sponsor terrorism” is the language of regime pressure, borderless pursuit, and, in practice, war.
The subtext is a theory of causation that conveniently maps onto American power. Terrorism isn’t framed as a tactic that can emerge from politics, occupation, grievance, or ideology; it’s treated as a supply chain with identifiable nodes: safe havens, financiers, state patrons. That framing does two things rhetorically. It makes the problem sound solvable if you’re willing to be relentless, and it shifts moral responsibility from messy historical dynamics to discrete “support systems” that can be dismantled. “Sanctuaries” is especially elastic: it can mean a mountain cave, a city neighborhood, an intelligence service, a sympathetic government. Elastic words are useful when you want flexible mandates.
Context matters: Wolfowitz is a post-Cold War defense intellectual who helped sell a post-9/11 worldview in which U.S. security required reshaping hostile regions, not just disrupting cells. “Broad and sustained campaign” isn’t a prediction; it’s a permission slip for duration and expansion. Accountability becomes less a legal endpoint than a strategic posture: keep going until the map looks different.
The subtext is a theory of causation that conveniently maps onto American power. Terrorism isn’t framed as a tactic that can emerge from politics, occupation, grievance, or ideology; it’s treated as a supply chain with identifiable nodes: safe havens, financiers, state patrons. That framing does two things rhetorically. It makes the problem sound solvable if you’re willing to be relentless, and it shifts moral responsibility from messy historical dynamics to discrete “support systems” that can be dismantled. “Sanctuaries” is especially elastic: it can mean a mountain cave, a city neighborhood, an intelligence service, a sympathetic government. Elastic words are useful when you want flexible mandates.
Context matters: Wolfowitz is a post-Cold War defense intellectual who helped sell a post-9/11 worldview in which U.S. security required reshaping hostile regions, not just disrupting cells. “Broad and sustained campaign” isn’t a prediction; it’s a permission slip for duration and expansion. Accountability becomes less a legal endpoint than a strategic posture: keep going until the map looks different.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List



