"I think operating systems work best if they're free and open. Particular applications are more likely to be proprietary"
About this Quote
Larry Wall is smuggling an entire software politics into a sentence that sounds like mild pragmatism. The first clause - "operating systems work best" - frames openness not as charity or ideology, but as engineering. An OS is plumbing: it touches everything, sets the rules for interoperability, and becomes a shared civic space for developers. If that foundation is closed, every downstream user pays in friction, lock-in, and brittle dependencies. By calling it "free and open", Wall invokes the hacker ethic without sermonizing; the word "best" does the heavy lifting, turning a moral argument into a performance claim.
Then comes the pivot: "Particular applications" can be proprietary. Subtext: markets can exist, but they should be built on commons. Wall isn't anti-business; he's drawing a boundary around where proprietary control becomes socially expensive. Applications are "particular" because they're optional, swappable, taste-driven. You can charge for a specialized tool without choking the ecosystem. An OS, by contrast, is the substrate where monopoly becomes destiny.
Context matters: Wall is the Perl creator, shaped by Unix culture and the late-20th-century rise of free software, but also by the reality that developers need to get paid. This line reads like a détente between Stallman-style purity and Silicon Valley capitalism: keep the ground open, let people sell houses. It's a compromise position that still contains a warning - privatize the platform, and you privatize everyone else's future.
Then comes the pivot: "Particular applications" can be proprietary. Subtext: markets can exist, but they should be built on commons. Wall isn't anti-business; he's drawing a boundary around where proprietary control becomes socially expensive. Applications are "particular" because they're optional, swappable, taste-driven. You can charge for a specialized tool without choking the ecosystem. An OS, by contrast, is the substrate where monopoly becomes destiny.
Context matters: Wall is the Perl creator, shaped by Unix culture and the late-20th-century rise of free software, but also by the reality that developers need to get paid. This line reads like a détente between Stallman-style purity and Silicon Valley capitalism: keep the ground open, let people sell houses. It's a compromise position that still contains a warning - privatize the platform, and you privatize everyone else's future.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coding & Programming |
|---|
More Quotes by Larry
Add to List
