"I think President Obama is trying to deceive the public in pretending that he was not a part of Congress that has made some decisions in the past that got us to where we are today"
About this Quote
Palin’s line is built to do two things at once: pin a crisis on Obama and deny him the political oxygen of “change.” The key move is the verb “pretending,” which smuggles in motive. It’s not that Obama is mistaken or oversimplifying; he’s performing an act of deception. That framing turns policy disagreement into a character indictment, a classic tactic when you want to make the audience stop weighing details and start policing trust.
The phrase “trying to deceive the public” also casts Palin as protector of a hoodwinked majority. It’s populist dramaturgy: the public as victim, the elite as con artist, the speaker as the one willing to say the rude thing out loud. She doesn’t need to specify which “decisions” or which “we” she’s talking about, because vagueness is the point. “Some decisions in the past” functions like a placeholder the listener can fill with their preferred grievances - bailouts, war votes, earmarks, party-line dealmaking - without Palin getting pinned down.
Context matters: this comes out of the post-2008 moment when Obama’s candidacy leaned hard on distance from Washington’s failures despite his U.S. Senate tenure. Palin’s intent is to collapse that distance by reclassifying him as part of “Congress,” not as a singular reform figure. It’s a rhetorical audit: you don’t get to run against the house if you’ve been living in it.
The subtext is less about legislative history than about permission. Palin is giving skeptical voters a clean rationale to dismiss Obama’s narrative as branding: not hope, just marketing.
The phrase “trying to deceive the public” also casts Palin as protector of a hoodwinked majority. It’s populist dramaturgy: the public as victim, the elite as con artist, the speaker as the one willing to say the rude thing out loud. She doesn’t need to specify which “decisions” or which “we” she’s talking about, because vagueness is the point. “Some decisions in the past” functions like a placeholder the listener can fill with their preferred grievances - bailouts, war votes, earmarks, party-line dealmaking - without Palin getting pinned down.
Context matters: this comes out of the post-2008 moment when Obama’s candidacy leaned hard on distance from Washington’s failures despite his U.S. Senate tenure. Palin’s intent is to collapse that distance by reclassifying him as part of “Congress,” not as a singular reform figure. It’s a rhetorical audit: you don’t get to run against the house if you’ve been living in it.
The subtext is less about legislative history than about permission. Palin is giving skeptical voters a clean rationale to dismiss Obama’s narrative as branding: not hope, just marketing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sarah
Add to List



