"I think that we have to do our job well, investigate thoroughly and then describe very honestly what we see to the Security Council. And some of the things might please people there and other things may not please the people"
About this Quote
Professional neutrality is doing a lot of heavy lifting here, and Hans Blix knows it. The line is built like a pledge - “do our job well,” “investigate thoroughly,” “describe very honestly” - a sequence of workmanlike verbs that sounds almost stubbornly boring. That’s the point. In a room where power performs certainty, Blix stakes authority in process. He’s not selling a narrative; he’s defending a method.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the Security Council’s appetite for convenient findings. “Some of the things might please people… other things may not” is diplomatic understatement with teeth. He’s signaling that the inspector’s mandate isn’t to validate anyone’s pre-written conclusion, whether it’s hawks seeking a casus belli or skeptics hoping for vindication. The symmetry of “please / not please” frames truth as politically uneven: the same report can be weaponized, dismissed, or selectively quoted depending on who’s reading.
Context matters because Blix became the face of UN weapons inspections in Iraq in the run-up to the 2003 invasion, when intelligence was being treated less as a searchlight than as a prop. His insistence on “describe… honestly” is a defensive maneuver against pressure that rarely arrives as an explicit demand. It arrives as tone, timing, and insinuation: hurry up, be decisive, don’t complicate the storyline. Blix’s intent is to remind the Council - and history - that inspectors aren’t there to please anyone. They’re there to put friction back into a machine that wants to move too fast.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the Security Council’s appetite for convenient findings. “Some of the things might please people… other things may not” is diplomatic understatement with teeth. He’s signaling that the inspector’s mandate isn’t to validate anyone’s pre-written conclusion, whether it’s hawks seeking a casus belli or skeptics hoping for vindication. The symmetry of “please / not please” frames truth as politically uneven: the same report can be weaponized, dismissed, or selectively quoted depending on who’s reading.
Context matters because Blix became the face of UN weapons inspections in Iraq in the run-up to the 2003 invasion, when intelligence was being treated less as a searchlight than as a prop. His insistence on “describe… honestly” is a defensive maneuver against pressure that rarely arrives as an explicit demand. It arrives as tone, timing, and insinuation: hurry up, be decisive, don’t complicate the storyline. Blix’s intent is to remind the Council - and history - that inspectors aren’t there to please anyone. They’re there to put friction back into a machine that wants to move too fast.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Hans
Add to List


