"I think the issue of clergy sexual abuse sparked people to look at their faith in a different way"
About this Quote
What’s doing the work here is the verb “sparked”: a clean, almost scientific word that frames a generational rupture as a catalyst for reflection rather than a catastrophe with culprits. William P. Leahy, speaking as an educator and institutional leader, chooses a vocabulary of classroom inquiry - “issue,” “look,” “different way” - that keeps the temperature low while acknowledging the temperature changed.
The intent feels twofold. First, to concede that clergy sexual abuse didn’t just damage individuals and families; it destabilized the entire trust architecture of religious life. People didn’t merely get angry at “bad actors.” They re-audited the system: authority, secrecy, the meaning of obedience, the gap between preached morality and practiced accountability. Second, to create space for faith to survive by recasting the crisis as a turning point in perception rather than an endpoint. “Look at their faith” is careful: it suggests interior reconsideration (belief, belonging, identity) without explicitly naming institutional failure or the Church’s role in enabling it.
The subtext is risk management in humane language. By calling it “the issue of clergy sexual abuse,” Leahy is smoothing the jagged edges of trauma into an abstract problem, a phrase that can circulate in boardrooms, faculty meetings, and donor conversations. That abstraction is precisely why the sentence works rhetorically: it invites broad agreement without forcing listeners to sit with graphic realities or legal culpability.
Context matters: in the post-2002 era (and again after later reports), the abuse crisis became a cultural inflection point, accelerating secularization for some and demanding a more skeptical, adult faith for others. Leahy’s line maps that shift: belief no longer arrives as inheritance; it arrives with cross-examination.
The intent feels twofold. First, to concede that clergy sexual abuse didn’t just damage individuals and families; it destabilized the entire trust architecture of religious life. People didn’t merely get angry at “bad actors.” They re-audited the system: authority, secrecy, the meaning of obedience, the gap between preached morality and practiced accountability. Second, to create space for faith to survive by recasting the crisis as a turning point in perception rather than an endpoint. “Look at their faith” is careful: it suggests interior reconsideration (belief, belonging, identity) without explicitly naming institutional failure or the Church’s role in enabling it.
The subtext is risk management in humane language. By calling it “the issue of clergy sexual abuse,” Leahy is smoothing the jagged edges of trauma into an abstract problem, a phrase that can circulate in boardrooms, faculty meetings, and donor conversations. That abstraction is precisely why the sentence works rhetorically: it invites broad agreement without forcing listeners to sit with graphic realities or legal culpability.
Context matters: in the post-2002 era (and again after later reports), the abuse crisis became a cultural inflection point, accelerating secularization for some and demanding a more skeptical, adult faith for others. Leahy’s line maps that shift: belief no longer arrives as inheritance; it arrives with cross-examination.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List




