"I think the most un-American thing you can say is, 'You can't say that.'"
About this Quote
Keillor’s line is a Midwestern-calm grenade: it turns the scold’s favorite phrase into a kind of anti-pledge. “You can’t say that” sounds like prudence, manners, maybe even protection. Keillor hears it as something closer to a civic betrayal, because it swaps argument for veto. The move is sly: he doesn’t defend any particular utterance, he defends the permission structure that makes public life possible.
The intent is less absolutist than it first appears. Keillor isn’t claiming speech has no consequences; he’s mocking the reflex to treat social discomfort as a constitutional emergency. By calling the prohibition “un-American,” he invokes a national self-myth: the U.S. as a place where talk is messy, obnoxious, and still preferable to silence enforced by consensus. It’s cultural pressure, not the First Amendment, that he’s really targeting - the way communities (and now platforms) enforce orthodoxies through shame, deplatforming, HR language, or the implied threat of exile from polite society.
The subtext lands because of who Keillor is: a writer whose persona trades in folksy civility and public radio gentleness. Coming from him, the warning about speech-policing feels like a diagnosis of the modern social mood: anxiety about saying the wrong thing, and a craving for rules that keep ambiguity from getting us in trouble. The line also carries a quiet dare. If “you can’t say that” is the sin, then the remedy isn’t saying anything at all - it’s building the thicker skin, better arguments, and more generous listening that a pluralistic country requires.
The intent is less absolutist than it first appears. Keillor isn’t claiming speech has no consequences; he’s mocking the reflex to treat social discomfort as a constitutional emergency. By calling the prohibition “un-American,” he invokes a national self-myth: the U.S. as a place where talk is messy, obnoxious, and still preferable to silence enforced by consensus. It’s cultural pressure, not the First Amendment, that he’s really targeting - the way communities (and now platforms) enforce orthodoxies through shame, deplatforming, HR language, or the implied threat of exile from polite society.
The subtext lands because of who Keillor is: a writer whose persona trades in folksy civility and public radio gentleness. Coming from him, the warning about speech-policing feels like a diagnosis of the modern social mood: anxiety about saying the wrong thing, and a craving for rules that keep ambiguity from getting us in trouble. The line also carries a quiet dare. If “you can’t say that” is the sin, then the remedy isn’t saying anything at all - it’s building the thicker skin, better arguments, and more generous listening that a pluralistic country requires.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Attributed to Garrison Keillor — listed on the Wikiquote page for Garrison Keillor (quote entry). Primary published source not specified there. |
More Quotes by Garrison
Add to List


