"I think the suffering, violence and cruelty and Guantanamo and the rest is going to go on and on in Iraq"
About this Quote
A politician rarely lists atrocities in a single breath unless she wants the listener to feel the trap snap shut. Clare Short’s line is built like an indictment: “suffering, violence and cruelty” isn’t descriptive so much as cumulative, a stacking of harms that denies the audience any comforting off-ramp. Then she drops “Guantanamo” into the sequence like a contaminant. It’s not geographically relevant to Iraq; it’s morally relevant to the West. The move is deliberate: she’s arguing that Iraq can’t be understood as a contained theater of war, because the practices and logic of the “war on terror” travel. If you normalize exceptional detention, secrecy, and coercion over there, you import the template everywhere.
The repetition of “and” matters. It mimics the endlessness she’s warning about, a sentence that won’t resolve because the policy won’t. “The rest” is the bleakest phrase in the quote: it implies a known catalog of abuses too long to name, and a political class already familiar with it, choosing euphemism anyway. That’s subtext as accusation.
Contextually, Short was one of the most prominent British Labour figures to break with Tony Blair over Iraq, resigning in 2003. Her intent isn’t to predict chaos as a tragic accident; it’s to frame it as a foreseeable product of strategy and complicity. By pairing Iraq with Guantanamo, she’s repositioning the debate from “Did we win?” to “What did we become?” That shift is the rhetorical power: it turns policy failure into moral debt with no easy statute of limitations.
The repetition of “and” matters. It mimics the endlessness she’s warning about, a sentence that won’t resolve because the policy won’t. “The rest” is the bleakest phrase in the quote: it implies a known catalog of abuses too long to name, and a political class already familiar with it, choosing euphemism anyway. That’s subtext as accusation.
Contextually, Short was one of the most prominent British Labour figures to break with Tony Blair over Iraq, resigning in 2003. Her intent isn’t to predict chaos as a tragic accident; it’s to frame it as a foreseeable product of strategy and complicity. By pairing Iraq with Guantanamo, she’s repositioning the debate from “Did we win?” to “What did we become?” That shift is the rhetorical power: it turns policy failure into moral debt with no easy statute of limitations.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Clare
Add to List



