"I think the way to change it is to handle issues individually when it's essential to do so"
About this Quote
Incrementalism dressed up as pragmatism: Harper’s line is a small sentence with a big governing philosophy hiding inside it. “Change it” is conspicuously vague, a placeholder that can mean the country, a policy regime, a scandal, even public expectations. That vagueness is the point. It keeps the speaker flexible while implying there is a “way” forward that isn’t ideological upheaval, but calibrated management.
The key phrase is “handle issues individually.” On the surface, it’s common-sense: don’t let one fight contaminate another; solve problems case by case. In Canadian political context, it also signals a preference for technocratic compartmentalization over grand narratives. Treat each controversy as discrete, and you reduce the risk of a unifying story forming around systemic failure. Opposition movements thrive on pattern recognition; “individually” breaks the pattern.
Then there’s the conditional: “when it’s essential.” Essential to whom, and by what standard? The subtext is control. Action becomes a matter of necessity as defined by the government, not urgency as felt by the public. It’s a way to promise responsiveness while pre-justifying delay: if the government doesn’t move, it wasn’t “essential.”
Coming from Harper, a politician often associated with message discipline and cautious institutional change, the line reads as both reassurance and boundary-setting. It offers voters the comfort of stability while quietly narrowing the conditions under which transformation is even allowed to begin.
The key phrase is “handle issues individually.” On the surface, it’s common-sense: don’t let one fight contaminate another; solve problems case by case. In Canadian political context, it also signals a preference for technocratic compartmentalization over grand narratives. Treat each controversy as discrete, and you reduce the risk of a unifying story forming around systemic failure. Opposition movements thrive on pattern recognition; “individually” breaks the pattern.
Then there’s the conditional: “when it’s essential.” Essential to whom, and by what standard? The subtext is control. Action becomes a matter of necessity as defined by the government, not urgency as felt by the public. It’s a way to promise responsiveness while pre-justifying delay: if the government doesn’t move, it wasn’t “essential.”
Coming from Harper, a politician often associated with message discipline and cautious institutional change, the line reads as both reassurance and boundary-setting. It offers voters the comfort of stability while quietly narrowing the conditions under which transformation is even allowed to begin.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List





