"I think the world is very much embracing this whole concept of musicians going out and playing their instruments and playing music for music as opposed to music that has something to do with some form of image or imagery"
About this Quote
Claypool is staking a claim for the band-as-band in an era that keeps trying to turn musicians into content creators. His phrasing is telling: he doesn’t say the world is rejecting image, just “embracing” the “concept” of musicians actually playing. That soft framing reads like diplomacy, but the subtext is a familiar musician’s complaint: the center of gravity has drifted from sound to spectacle, from craft to branding.
Coming from Les Claypool - a virtuoso bassist who built a career on eccentric technique and live musicianship - the line doubles as self-portrait and cultural diagnosis. Primus was never a carefully airbrushed aesthetic project; it was an argument, made onstage, that weird chops and musical risk can be the hook. So when he contrasts “music for music” with music tethered to “image or imagery,” he’s not moralizing about fashion or videos. He’s pointing at the incentive structure: labels, algorithms, and social platforms reward what reads instantly - a look, a persona, a clip-friendly identity - more reliably than what rewards repeated listening.
The repetition of “playing” matters. It’s physical, workmanlike, almost stubborn. Claypool is advocating for presence: the imperfect, high-wire thrill of real performance as an antidote to a culture of curated perfection. There’s also a quiet optimism tucked inside his complaint. He’s betting that audiences are getting tired of the cosplay of authenticity and are hungry again for the unmistakable proof of it: hands on strings, air moving, musicians communicating in real time.
Coming from Les Claypool - a virtuoso bassist who built a career on eccentric technique and live musicianship - the line doubles as self-portrait and cultural diagnosis. Primus was never a carefully airbrushed aesthetic project; it was an argument, made onstage, that weird chops and musical risk can be the hook. So when he contrasts “music for music” with music tethered to “image or imagery,” he’s not moralizing about fashion or videos. He’s pointing at the incentive structure: labels, algorithms, and social platforms reward what reads instantly - a look, a persona, a clip-friendly identity - more reliably than what rewards repeated listening.
The repetition of “playing” matters. It’s physical, workmanlike, almost stubborn. Claypool is advocating for presence: the imperfect, high-wire thrill of real performance as an antidote to a culture of curated perfection. There’s also a quiet optimism tucked inside his complaint. He’s betting that audiences are getting tired of the cosplay of authenticity and are hungry again for the unmistakable proof of it: hands on strings, air moving, musicians communicating in real time.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Les
Add to List


