"I think to be in politics you have to have the taste for blood on that"

The quote by Moira Kelly, "I believe to be in politics you have to have the taste for blood on that", suggests a rather negative view of the political arena. It suggests that politics is naturally combative and frequently ruthless, requiring participants to engage in intense competition and, sometimes, ethically ambiguous actions to achieve their goals. Here's an analysis of what this may indicate:

1. ** Competitive Nature **: Politics is not for the faint-hearted. The idea of having a "taste for blood" metaphorically communicates the idea that political leaders should be prepared to take part in fights, both actual in the kind of debates and metaphorical in regards to methods that might include undermining challengers. This competitive nature recommends a survival-of-the-fittest environment where only the strong-willed and tactically proficient can flourish.

2. ** Moral Ambiguity **: The reference to "blood" may also suggest that politics frequently involves making tough decisions that might harm others or compromise one's own ethical standards. Politicians might have to participate in activities or assistance policies that can negatively affect certain groups or people, requiring a specific degree of emotional detachment or rationalization.

3. ** Aggression and Resilience **: A "taste for blood" can likewise signify hostility and a steadfast decision to prosper. Political leaders typically face intense analysis, opposition, and pressure, requiring a durable and, at times, combative technique to navigate the intricacies of governance and public service.

4. ** Strategic Maneuvering **: The phrase recommends the need for tactical acumen. Political leaders should be capable of outthinking their challengers, expecting relocations, and strategically positioning themselves to get benefits, often looking like a battlefield where tactical expertise is essential.

In conclusion, Moira Kelly's quote underscores the idea that politics is a domain requiring strength, strategic thinking, and a desire to navigate morally intricate scenarios. It paints a picture of political life as a perpetual contest needing not just skill and intelligence but likewise a certain level of emotional perseverance and tactical ruthlessness.