"I think to compare any time you win a Stanley Cup would be unfair to all the players from all the teams"
About this Quote
Messier is doing the classic champion’s two-step: celebrating without tempting the hockey gods. On the surface, he’s arguing that every Stanley Cup is its own weather system, impossible to rank without disrespecting the people who bled for the others. But the real work of the line is humility-as-leadership, a veteran’s way of keeping the story from collapsing into ego or nostalgia.
The phrasing matters. “Unfair” is moral language, not just logistical language. He isn’t saying comparison is difficult; he’s saying it’s ethically suspect, almost indecent, because it turns collective sacrifice into a personal highlight reel. That’s a pointed corrective in a sport where legacies are constantly stacked like trading cards: which Cup meant more, which team was tougher, which run was “the” run. Messier’s answer refuses the bait while still acknowledging the premise: yes, winning is monumental, and yes, people want a hierarchy. He just won’t provide it.
There’s also a locker-room subtext. “All the players from all the teams” expands the circle beyond his own teammates to include opponents and other eras, an insider’s recognition that championships are built on a league-wide ecosystem of pain tolerance, talent, and luck. It’s a diplomatic move that protects relationships and burnishes credibility: if you treat other winners as peers, your own accomplishments land as more legitimate, not less.
Contextually, it reads like a post-win or retrospective interview moment where the media wants a neat narrative. Messier offers something harder to package: reverence for the grind, not a ranking of the glory.
The phrasing matters. “Unfair” is moral language, not just logistical language. He isn’t saying comparison is difficult; he’s saying it’s ethically suspect, almost indecent, because it turns collective sacrifice into a personal highlight reel. That’s a pointed corrective in a sport where legacies are constantly stacked like trading cards: which Cup meant more, which team was tougher, which run was “the” run. Messier’s answer refuses the bait while still acknowledging the premise: yes, winning is monumental, and yes, people want a hierarchy. He just won’t provide it.
There’s also a locker-room subtext. “All the players from all the teams” expands the circle beyond his own teammates to include opponents and other eras, an insider’s recognition that championships are built on a league-wide ecosystem of pain tolerance, talent, and luck. It’s a diplomatic move that protects relationships and burnishes credibility: if you treat other winners as peers, your own accomplishments land as more legitimate, not less.
Contextually, it reads like a post-win or retrospective interview moment where the media wants a neat narrative. Messier offers something harder to package: reverence for the grind, not a ranking of the glory.
Quote Details
| Topic | Victory |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List

