"I think we have got to start thinking about banding together in terms of interested groups"
About this Quote
The intent here is pragmatic, almost managerial. Levitt is urging constituencies to stop acting like isolated complainants and start acting like a block with leverage. Read it in the register of late-20th-century regulatory politics, and it’s also a warning: if reformers, investors, consumers, or honest market actors don’t coordinate, the better-funded, better-networked interests already have. “Got to” carries the tell. This isn’t a suggestion; it’s a survival tactic in an ecosystem where policy outcomes often belong to whoever shows up most coherently.
The subtext is that legitimacy now competes with organization. Levitt frames collective action as “thinking,” not arm-twisting, because a public servant has to keep one foot in the language of consensus even when describing conflict. That restraint is the rhetorical trick: he normalizes interest-group politics without celebrating it, presenting coordination as responsible citizenship rather than raw lobbying. It’s a line that flatters the listener’s motives while recruiting them into the only game that reliably works.
Quote Details
| Topic | Team Building |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Levitt, Arthur. (2026, January 17). I think we have got to start thinking about banding together in terms of interested groups. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-have-got-to-start-thinking-about-36169/
Chicago Style
Levitt, Arthur. "I think we have got to start thinking about banding together in terms of interested groups." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-have-got-to-start-thinking-about-36169/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I think we have got to start thinking about banding together in terms of interested groups." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-have-got-to-start-thinking-about-36169/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





