"I think we should worry about Social Security first and then tax cuts second"
About this Quote
The subtext is a warning about tradeoffs. Scott is implicitly accusing tax-cut advocates of treating the federal budget like a magic trick: shrink revenue now, then later claim there’s no choice but to “reform” entitlements. In that sense, the sentence is less a policy memo than an attempt to expose a sequence Democrats have watched for decades: tax cuts first, panic about deficits second, cuts to the safety net third. By flipping the order, Scott tries to collapse that script.
Contextually, this fits the long-running fight over what fiscal seriousness is supposed to mean. Tax cuts can be sold as growth or freedom, but Social Security is sold as a promise. Scott’s intent is to make breaking that promise feel like the real radicalism, and to position himself on the side of continuity: pay the bills, protect retirees, then argue about the rest.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Scott, Bobby. (2026, January 17). I think we should worry about Social Security first and then tax cuts second. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-should-worry-about-social-security-74882/
Chicago Style
Scott, Bobby. "I think we should worry about Social Security first and then tax cuts second." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-should-worry-about-social-security-74882/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I think we should worry about Social Security first and then tax cuts second." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-think-we-should-worry-about-social-security-74882/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.

