"I think we're at risk with our democracy. I think we're dealing with the most closed, imperialistic, nastiest administration in living memory. They even put Richard Nixon to shame"
About this Quote
Clark’s language isn’t the careful hedging of a retired general trying to sound “above politics.” It’s escalation by design: “at risk with our democracy” sets the stakes at system-level failure, then “closed, imperialistic, nastiest” piles on a triad of moral charges that land more like an indictment than an assessment. The phrasing matters. “Closed” suggests secrecy and contempt for oversight; “imperialistic” invokes executive overreach and foreign adventurism; “nastiest” is the blunt, almost locker-room adjective that signals disgust, not just disagreement.
The Nixon comparison is the sharpest blade here. Nixon has become a cultural shorthand for abuse of power, paranoia, and executive corruption. Saying an administration “puts Richard Nixon to shame” is hyperbole with a purpose: it shortcuts a long argument into a single, widely understood reference point, and it pressures the listener to treat the current moment as a constitutional emergency rather than ordinary partisan turbulence.
Context is doing heavy lifting. Clark speaks as a soldier, a credential that typically buys trust on questions of national security and the proper use of force. When someone from that world uses “imperialistic,” it reads as insider alarm, not campus rhetoric. Subtext: the guardrails are failing, and the institutions that usually restrain an administration - Congress, courts, press, even internal dissent - are being sidelined. He’s not only attacking policy; he’s framing a legitimacy crisis, warning that the methods of governing are becoming the story.
The Nixon comparison is the sharpest blade here. Nixon has become a cultural shorthand for abuse of power, paranoia, and executive corruption. Saying an administration “puts Richard Nixon to shame” is hyperbole with a purpose: it shortcuts a long argument into a single, widely understood reference point, and it pressures the listener to treat the current moment as a constitutional emergency rather than ordinary partisan turbulence.
Context is doing heavy lifting. Clark speaks as a soldier, a credential that typically buys trust on questions of national security and the proper use of force. When someone from that world uses “imperialistic,” it reads as insider alarm, not campus rhetoric. Subtext: the guardrails are failing, and the institutions that usually restrain an administration - Congress, courts, press, even internal dissent - are being sidelined. He’s not only attacking policy; he’s framing a legitimacy crisis, warning that the methods of governing are becoming the story.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Wesley
Add to List





