"I think what separates me from the candidates is the fact that I have a proven track record of being a fighter. A fighting for what people believe in, whether it is popular or not. Despite the opposition, I stand true. Because people know that I will do what I say. And that I say what I do"
About this Quote
Bachmann is selling a brand, not a policy: the candidate as combatant, authenticity as muscle memory. “Fighter” is the keystone word, repeated until it stops describing a tactic and starts functioning as a moral credential. In a crowded primary field, “proven track record” borrows the language of resumes and court evidence, then pivots into identity politics of character: I am the one who takes hits and keeps swinging.
The line “whether it is popular or not” is doing heavy work. It frames unpopularity as proof of virtue, turning backlash into validation. That’s a classic move in insurgent conservative rhetoric of the era: opposition isn’t a warning sign, it’s a scoreboard. “Despite the opposition, I stand true” suggests there’s a stable, almost sacred “true” self being threatened by outsiders - a quiet nod to cultural grievance without naming the grievances.
Even the clunky “A fighting for what people believe in” (grammatically off, rhetorically revealing) shifts agency from her to “people,” letting her posture as both avatar and defender. She’s not merely stubborn; she’s faithful to a constituency’s “beliefs,” a word that conveniently blurs moral convictions with policy specifics.
The closing couplet - “I will do what I say. And that I say what I do” - is an anti-politician promise packaged as a tautology. It’s meant to feel like plain talk, but it’s also a preemptive inoculation against fact-checks: consistency becomes the standard, not outcomes. In the post-Tea Party moment, “fighter” is the pitch for purity, not persuasion.
The line “whether it is popular or not” is doing heavy work. It frames unpopularity as proof of virtue, turning backlash into validation. That’s a classic move in insurgent conservative rhetoric of the era: opposition isn’t a warning sign, it’s a scoreboard. “Despite the opposition, I stand true” suggests there’s a stable, almost sacred “true” self being threatened by outsiders - a quiet nod to cultural grievance without naming the grievances.
Even the clunky “A fighting for what people believe in” (grammatically off, rhetorically revealing) shifts agency from her to “people,” letting her posture as both avatar and defender. She’s not merely stubborn; she’s faithful to a constituency’s “beliefs,” a word that conveniently blurs moral convictions with policy specifics.
The closing couplet - “I will do what I say. And that I say what I do” - is an anti-politician promise packaged as a tautology. It’s meant to feel like plain talk, but it’s also a preemptive inoculation against fact-checks: consistency becomes the standard, not outcomes. In the post-Tea Party moment, “fighter” is the pitch for purity, not persuasion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Michele
Add to List







