"I thought he was an interesting central figure, central character, one who is definitely not your typical central character figure in a film, who's easy to like. He's not easy to like. It forces you to involve yourself with what's going on"
About this Quote
Warburton is pointing to a quiet rebellion against the algorithmic demand that protagonists be instantly lovable, meme-ready, and morally frictionless. He’s describing a central figure designed less as an avatar for easy projection and more as a stubborn object you have to contend with. That “not easy to like” isn’t a flaw to be fixed; it’s the mechanism. Dislike becomes a narrative engine.
The intent here is practical, actor-to-audience: complicated characters make better movies because they deny you the lazy posture of cheering from a safe distance. When a film hands you a charming lead, it often gives you a shortcut through the story. You know where your sympathies are supposed to go, so you can coast. Warburton’s emphasis on being “forced” to involve yourself suggests a film that weaponizes discomfort, using irritation, distrust, or moral ambiguity to keep you leaning forward. You’re not simply watching behavior; you’re auditing your own reactions to it.
Subtextually, he’s also defending a certain kind of performance and writing that risks alienating viewers in exchange for engagement. In the current culture of hot takes and “relatable” protagonists, an unlikable lead can look like a liability. Warburton frames it as a pact: the movie won’t seduce you into agreement, but it will recruit you into judgment. The payoff isn’t affection; it’s participation.
The intent here is practical, actor-to-audience: complicated characters make better movies because they deny you the lazy posture of cheering from a safe distance. When a film hands you a charming lead, it often gives you a shortcut through the story. You know where your sympathies are supposed to go, so you can coast. Warburton’s emphasis on being “forced” to involve yourself suggests a film that weaponizes discomfort, using irritation, distrust, or moral ambiguity to keep you leaning forward. You’re not simply watching behavior; you’re auditing your own reactions to it.
Subtextually, he’s also defending a certain kind of performance and writing that risks alienating viewers in exchange for engagement. In the current culture of hot takes and “relatable” protagonists, an unlikable lead can look like a liability. Warburton frames it as a pact: the movie won’t seduce you into agreement, but it will recruit you into judgment. The payoff isn’t affection; it’s participation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Patrick
Add to List




