"I thought then, and I think now, that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and unjust. And I think the premises on which it was launched were false"
About this Quote
Carter’s sentence is built like a moral affidavit: steady, spare, and meant to outlast the news cycle. The opening hinge - "I thought then, and I think now" - isn’t just emphasis; it’s a bid for credibility in a political culture that rewards convenient amnesia. He frames his objection as durable judgment rather than partisan reaction, positioning himself as a witness whose conscience didn’t evolve with polling.
The trio of charges escalates with prosecutorial rhythm. "Unnecessary" targets the war’s strategic rationale: no credible last resort, no unavoidable threat. "Unjust" shifts from policy to ethics, invoking just-war standards without name-checking them. Carter’s intent is to deny the invasion both pragmatic and moral legitimacy, leaving supporters fewer places to hide: it wasn’t merely mishandled, it was wrong.
Then comes the most corrosive line: "the premises...were false". Carter chooses "premises" over "facts", a sharper insult. He’s not only disputing intelligence claims; he’s indicting the architecture of persuasion - the curated arguments, the stage-managed certainty, the political storytelling that converted ambiguity into casus belli. "Launched" is doing quiet work, too, suggesting a planned deployment of force, not an unfortunate drift into conflict.
The context matters: Carter, a former president with a reputation for human rights moralism, is staking out a minority position among peers who either supported the war or softened their critiques into procedural regrets. This is Carter refusing the sanitized retrospective - the version where everyone was misled equally - and insisting responsibility attaches to the decision itself, not just its execution.
The trio of charges escalates with prosecutorial rhythm. "Unnecessary" targets the war’s strategic rationale: no credible last resort, no unavoidable threat. "Unjust" shifts from policy to ethics, invoking just-war standards without name-checking them. Carter’s intent is to deny the invasion both pragmatic and moral legitimacy, leaving supporters fewer places to hide: it wasn’t merely mishandled, it was wrong.
Then comes the most corrosive line: "the premises...were false". Carter chooses "premises" over "facts", a sharper insult. He’s not only disputing intelligence claims; he’s indicting the architecture of persuasion - the curated arguments, the stage-managed certainty, the political storytelling that converted ambiguity into casus belli. "Launched" is doing quiet work, too, suggesting a planned deployment of force, not an unfortunate drift into conflict.
The context matters: Carter, a former president with a reputation for human rights moralism, is staking out a minority position among peers who either supported the war or softened their critiques into procedural regrets. This is Carter refusing the sanitized retrospective - the version where everyone was misled equally - and insisting responsibility attaches to the decision itself, not just its execution.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Jimmy
Add to List

