"I view advertising as being this romanticizing element that helps us appreciate, understand and enjoy how remarkable it is that we've been able to do so much, and learn so much. I view it as really vital, even though sometimes it can be really annoying"
About this Quote
Lanier is doing a sly reframing: taking the cultural villain of modern life and casting it as a kind of awe engine. Calling advertising a "romanticizing element" doesn’t just soften its image; it positions ads as storytelling technology, the glossy narrator that turns raw human capability (industry, science, logistics, media) into something you can feel. He’s less interested in whether ads are true than in what they do to perception: they translate complexity into desire, progress into vibes, and innovation into a shared cultural language you can recognize in an instant.
The subtext is classic Lanier: ambivalence as critique. He grants advertising a civic function ("vital") while acknowledging its irritant status ("really annoying"), which is his way of admitting the bargain we’ve struck. The annoyance isn’t a side effect; it’s evidence of saturation, of a system that must constantly colonize attention to keep itself alive. By framing ads as helping us "appreciate" what we’ve learned, he hints at an uncomfortable dependency: that we increasingly need marketing to tell us what counts as remarkable.
Context matters here. Lanier emerged from the techno-utopian era, then became one of its most articulate skeptics, especially about attention economies. As an artist, he’s attuned to persuasion as aesthetic craft. This quote reads like a backhanded defense: advertising is beautiful propaganda for modernity, and we hate it precisely because it works - because it scripts our sense of progress while quietly billing us in distraction.
The subtext is classic Lanier: ambivalence as critique. He grants advertising a civic function ("vital") while acknowledging its irritant status ("really annoying"), which is his way of admitting the bargain we’ve struck. The annoyance isn’t a side effect; it’s evidence of saturation, of a system that must constantly colonize attention to keep itself alive. By framing ads as helping us "appreciate" what we’ve learned, he hints at an uncomfortable dependency: that we increasingly need marketing to tell us what counts as remarkable.
Context matters here. Lanier emerged from the techno-utopian era, then became one of its most articulate skeptics, especially about attention economies. As an artist, he’s attuned to persuasion as aesthetic craft. This quote reads like a backhanded defense: advertising is beautiful propaganda for modernity, and we hate it precisely because it works - because it scripts our sense of progress while quietly billing us in distraction.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marketing |
|---|
More Quotes by Jaron
Add to List
