"I want to attract the best people into teaching"
About this Quote
"I want to attract the best people into teaching" is the kind of sunny, impossible-to-argue-with line politicians love because it sounds like a moral stance while quietly dodging every hard choice that would make it real. Schumer’s intent is straightforward: position himself on the side of kids, competence, and the future, while signaling to donors and moderates that this is a “human capital” problem, not a fight over power in schools.
The subtext is doing most of the work. “Attract” frames teaching like a labor-market pipeline: if we just tweak incentives, talented people will naturally flow in. It’s a business-friendly verb that sidesteps the messier question of retention - why good teachers leave once they arrive. “The best people” is also strategically vague. Best at what: test-score gains, mentorship, special education, classroom management, cultural fluency, sticking around for 15 years? In practice, that phrase often smuggles in a preference for elite credentials and fast-track programs, which can flatter meritocratic instincts while undervaluing experience and community ties.
Context matters: when a senior Democrat says this, it’s typically a bridge between two pressures. One is genuine anxiety about teacher shortages, burnout, and declining institutional trust. The other is the party’s balancing act between pro-union constituencies and reform-minded narratives that treat schools as systems to be “optimized.” The line works because it casts education policy as aspiration rather than confrontation, making everyone feel invited - right up until the bill has to name salaries, working conditions, and who gets to define “best.”
The subtext is doing most of the work. “Attract” frames teaching like a labor-market pipeline: if we just tweak incentives, talented people will naturally flow in. It’s a business-friendly verb that sidesteps the messier question of retention - why good teachers leave once they arrive. “The best people” is also strategically vague. Best at what: test-score gains, mentorship, special education, classroom management, cultural fluency, sticking around for 15 years? In practice, that phrase often smuggles in a preference for elite credentials and fast-track programs, which can flatter meritocratic instincts while undervaluing experience and community ties.
Context matters: when a senior Democrat says this, it’s typically a bridge between two pressures. One is genuine anxiety about teacher shortages, burnout, and declining institutional trust. The other is the party’s balancing act between pro-union constituencies and reform-minded narratives that treat schools as systems to be “optimized.” The line works because it casts education policy as aspiration rather than confrontation, making everyone feel invited - right up until the bill has to name salaries, working conditions, and who gets to define “best.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List



