"I wanted to connect a modern story with a myth that I had read"
About this Quote
Wally Lamb’s line is disarmingly plain, which is exactly why it lands: it frames mythology not as a dusty source of “timeless themes,” but as usable circuitry for contemporary life. “Connect” is the operative verb. He’s not saying he wanted to retell a myth, or pay homage, or dress a present-day plot in antique costumes. He’s describing a splice: the old narrative as infrastructure, the modern story as current.
The intent reads craft-first. Lamb is signaling a deliberate architecture choice, the way a novelist might choose a second-person narrator or a courtroom setting. Myths come preloaded with emotional geometry - archetypes, taboos, fated choices, cycles of harm and rescue - and that means a modern plot can move with more gravity, faster. You don’t have to explain why a certain kind of longing feels perilous; the myth has already trained the reader’s instincts.
The subtext is also about legitimacy. Contemporary domestic pain, family secrets, the stuff Lamb often writes toward, can be dismissed as private mess. Anchoring it to myth quietly argues the opposite: these are not small stories; they’re patterned, inheritable, almost ritual. The personal becomes structural.
Context matters because Lamb writes in an era when literary fiction is expected to be psychologically realistic, suspicious of grand statements. Myth gives him a way to smuggle in the grandness without sounding grand. The ancient story operates like a bassline under the realist melody: you may not notice it consciously, but it makes the whole thing feel inevitable.
The intent reads craft-first. Lamb is signaling a deliberate architecture choice, the way a novelist might choose a second-person narrator or a courtroom setting. Myths come preloaded with emotional geometry - archetypes, taboos, fated choices, cycles of harm and rescue - and that means a modern plot can move with more gravity, faster. You don’t have to explain why a certain kind of longing feels perilous; the myth has already trained the reader’s instincts.
The subtext is also about legitimacy. Contemporary domestic pain, family secrets, the stuff Lamb often writes toward, can be dismissed as private mess. Anchoring it to myth quietly argues the opposite: these are not small stories; they’re patterned, inheritable, almost ritual. The personal becomes structural.
Context matters because Lamb writes in an era when literary fiction is expected to be psychologically realistic, suspicious of grand statements. Myth gives him a way to smuggle in the grandness without sounding grand. The ancient story operates like a bassline under the realist melody: you may not notice it consciously, but it makes the whole thing feel inevitable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Wally
Add to List
