"I was 37 years old. I wanted to support myself by writing"
About this Quote
At 37, Rossner is quietly refusing the myth that writers are born fully formed at 22, discovered in a café, and whisked into solvency by genius alone. The sentence is blunt to the point of austerity: age, desire, and the unglamorous verb "support". No romance, no divine calling, no tortured-artist halo. Just an adult looking at rent and time and deciding that writing should count as work.
The specific intent feels almost corrective. Rossner was publishing into a literary marketplace that loved women’s books when they were either genteel or sensational, but rarely treated women’s labor as straightforward professional ambition. "I wanted to support myself" lands as both practical and faintly defiant: a claim to independence, to not being subsidized by a spouse, a day job, or the soft patronage of respectability. At 37, the aspiration reads less like youthful dreaminess and more like a plan made after seeing how systems actually operate.
The subtext is that writing is being framed as a wage-earning craft rather than an identity. That choice matters. It sidesteps the sentimental narrative (I wrote because I had to) in favor of economic agency (I wrote so I could live). In the broader context of the late-20th-century literary world, it’s also a reminder that the "career novelist" has always been a precarious category, and that insisting on art as livelihood is itself a radical kind of seriousness.
The specific intent feels almost corrective. Rossner was publishing into a literary marketplace that loved women’s books when they were either genteel or sensational, but rarely treated women’s labor as straightforward professional ambition. "I wanted to support myself" lands as both practical and faintly defiant: a claim to independence, to not being subsidized by a spouse, a day job, or the soft patronage of respectability. At 37, the aspiration reads less like youthful dreaminess and more like a plan made after seeing how systems actually operate.
The subtext is that writing is being framed as a wage-earning craft rather than an identity. That choice matters. It sidesteps the sentimental narrative (I wrote because I had to) in favor of economic agency (I wrote so I could live). In the broader context of the late-20th-century literary world, it’s also a reminder that the "career novelist" has always been a precarious category, and that insisting on art as livelihood is itself a radical kind of seriousness.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Judith
Add to List
