"I was about five years old when I was eating soup in our kitchen, and as I was lifting the spoon towards my mouth, it bent and broke in half"
About this Quote
A childhood soup spoon snapping in half is a perfectly chosen origin story: domestic, banal, and just strange enough to lodge in your brain. Uri Geller isn’t describing a trauma or a triumph; he’s staging the first scene of a myth about giftedness. The kitchen matters. It’s not a laboratory, not a stage, not a séance room. It’s the one place where “real life” happens, so the implied message is: this didn’t begin as an act. It began as nature.
The specificity does a lot of work. “About five years old” signals innocence and fuzzy memory at once. He’s old enough to narrate, young enough to be presumed uncalculating. “Eating soup” adds a tactile rhythm: the spoon rising, the anticipatory pause, the moment where physics should behave. When it doesn’t, the story manufactures wonder without needing cosmic language. A bent spoon is uncanny; a spoon that breaks “in half” is emphatic, final, hard to hand-wave away as a small deformity.
The subtext is also defensive. Geller’s career sits in the tension between psychic claim and performance tradition. By rooting the phenomenon in an unrepeatable, private childhood moment, he sidesteps the most brutal demand skeptics make: do it again, under control. The scene isn’t evidence; it’s branding. It invites you to accept a premise (something in him changes objects) before you ever reach the later controversies, TV demonstrations, and accusations of trickery. It’s not just a memory; it’s a permission slip for the audience to want to believe.
The specificity does a lot of work. “About five years old” signals innocence and fuzzy memory at once. He’s old enough to narrate, young enough to be presumed uncalculating. “Eating soup” adds a tactile rhythm: the spoon rising, the anticipatory pause, the moment where physics should behave. When it doesn’t, the story manufactures wonder without needing cosmic language. A bent spoon is uncanny; a spoon that breaks “in half” is emphatic, final, hard to hand-wave away as a small deformity.
The subtext is also defensive. Geller’s career sits in the tension between psychic claim and performance tradition. By rooting the phenomenon in an unrepeatable, private childhood moment, he sidesteps the most brutal demand skeptics make: do it again, under control. The scene isn’t evidence; it’s branding. It invites you to accept a premise (something in him changes objects) before you ever reach the later controversies, TV demonstrations, and accusations of trickery. It’s not just a memory; it’s a permission slip for the audience to want to believe.
Quote Details
| Topic | Youth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Uri
Add to List





