"I was always influenced by language"
About this Quote
“I was always influenced by language” lands like a quiet confession from someone who never believed words were neutral. For a poet, it’s an origin story and a warning: language isn’t just the tool you use, it’s the force that shapes what you can notice, remember, desire, even refuse. Dunmore’s “always” matters. It suggests a lifetime of being acted upon before acting back - childhood listening, classroom cadences, the inherited rhythms of family speech. The subtext is almost anti-Romantic: inspiration doesn’t descend from the clouds; it arrives through diction, syntax, the specific grain of how a culture talks.
The phrasing flips the usual hierarchy. Writers are often framed as masters of language, bending it to their will. Dunmore positions herself as porous, susceptible, changed. That vulnerability is strategic: it dignifies attentiveness as a creative ethic. If language influences you, then craft begins in receptivity - in being alert to how a single word can tilt a scene’s moral temperature, how a metaphor smuggles ideology in under beauty, how official language can launder violence into procedure.
Contextually, Dunmore wrote across poetry and historical fiction, often circling memory, embodiment, and the pressures of the social world on private lives. Read against that, the line hints at why her work can feel both intimate and haunted: the past survives not just in events but in the phrases available to name them. She’s staking a claim that language is history’s most intimate technology - and the poet’s job is to notice its fingerprints everywhere.
The phrasing flips the usual hierarchy. Writers are often framed as masters of language, bending it to their will. Dunmore positions herself as porous, susceptible, changed. That vulnerability is strategic: it dignifies attentiveness as a creative ethic. If language influences you, then craft begins in receptivity - in being alert to how a single word can tilt a scene’s moral temperature, how a metaphor smuggles ideology in under beauty, how official language can launder violence into procedure.
Contextually, Dunmore wrote across poetry and historical fiction, often circling memory, embodiment, and the pressures of the social world on private lives. Read against that, the line hints at why her work can feel both intimate and haunted: the past survives not just in events but in the phrases available to name them. She’s staking a claim that language is history’s most intimate technology - and the poet’s job is to notice its fingerprints everywhere.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Helen
Add to List
