"I was aware that everybody said I was going to be a vast mega-flop, and that William Hague was just oh-so intelligent, and oh such a great parliamentarian, and therefore so different from me! So I thought, I must deprive them of the satisfaction of proving themselves right"
About this Quote
Harriet Harman’s line has the satisfying snap of a politician letting the mask slip just enough to show the raw mechanics underneath: politics isn’t only about competence, it’s about the audience’s hunger for a storyline. The “vast mega-flop” isn’t merely insult; it’s a prewritten script, a gleeful media plot in which a woman in power is cast as a temporary mistake. By quoting it so extravagantly, Harman turns the ridicule into caricature, making the pundits sound childish and self-congratulatory.
The name-check of William Hague does double duty. On the surface it’s a jab at the Westminster habit of confusing verbal polish with leadership. Underneath, it’s a gendered indictment: Hague is framed as “oh-so intelligent” and “such a great parliamentarian” because he fits the default template of who looks like authority. Harman’s “therefore so different from me!” lands as sarcasm and as a grim acknowledgement that difference itself is treated as disqualification.
The real engine here is motive. “I must deprive them of the satisfaction” is less about personal vindication than about refusing to feed the machine that thrives on humiliation. It’s a portrait of political survival as spite-fueled discipline: not aspiring to love, not even to fairness, but to denying your critics the clean ending they crave. In a culture that prizes the takedown, Harman frames persistence as its own rebuttal.
The name-check of William Hague does double duty. On the surface it’s a jab at the Westminster habit of confusing verbal polish with leadership. Underneath, it’s a gendered indictment: Hague is framed as “oh-so intelligent” and “such a great parliamentarian” because he fits the default template of who looks like authority. Harman’s “therefore so different from me!” lands as sarcasm and as a grim acknowledgement that difference itself is treated as disqualification.
The real engine here is motive. “I must deprive them of the satisfaction” is less about personal vindication than about refusing to feed the machine that thrives on humiliation. It’s a portrait of political survival as spite-fueled discipline: not aspiring to love, not even to fairness, but to denying your critics the clean ending they crave. In a culture that prizes the takedown, Harman frames persistence as its own rebuttal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Never Give Up |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Harriet
Add to List





