"I was not interested in irony; I wanted to emphasize the primacy of the idea in making art"
About this Quote
LeWitt’s line is a quiet declaration of war against the art world’s favorite alibi: cool distance. To say he wasn’t interested in irony is to refuse the protective smirk that lets artists gesture at meaning without committing to it. Irony keeps the maker safely above the work, a curator of vibes. LeWitt wanted something riskier and, in its own way, more radical: to treat the idea not as an accessory but as the engine.
That insistence lands squarely in the context of 1960s Conceptualism, when painting’s heroic gestures and Pop’s knowing wink were both starting to feel like closed systems. LeWitt’s primacy-of-idea stance wasn’t anti-visual; it was anti-mystique. By elevating the concept over the artist’s hand, he rerouted authorship into a set of instructions, a score that others could execute. The artwork becomes less a relic of personal expression than a repeatable proposition, closer to architecture or software than to oil paint. That’s where the subtext bites: if the idea is primary, the market’s obsession with the singular object, the fetish of touch and originality, starts to look like a category error.
It also explains the austerity of his wall drawings and structures. They aren’t trying to seduce you into narrative or personality; they test how a simple rule generates complexity in real space. In an era addicted to hot takes, LeWitt’s anti-irony reads almost rebellious: sincerity, but stripped of sentimentality, anchored in method.
That insistence lands squarely in the context of 1960s Conceptualism, when painting’s heroic gestures and Pop’s knowing wink were both starting to feel like closed systems. LeWitt’s primacy-of-idea stance wasn’t anti-visual; it was anti-mystique. By elevating the concept over the artist’s hand, he rerouted authorship into a set of instructions, a score that others could execute. The artwork becomes less a relic of personal expression than a repeatable proposition, closer to architecture or software than to oil paint. That’s where the subtext bites: if the idea is primary, the market’s obsession with the singular object, the fetish of touch and originality, starts to look like a category error.
It also explains the austerity of his wall drawings and structures. They aren’t trying to seduce you into narrative or personality; they test how a simple rule generates complexity in real space. In an era addicted to hot takes, LeWitt’s anti-irony reads almost rebellious: sincerity, but stripped of sentimentality, anchored in method.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sol
Add to List





