"I was particularly good at math and science"
About this Quote
There is a quiet kind of authority in a line this plain. "I was particularly good at math and science" reads like modest autobiography, but in the mouth of William Standish Knowles it doubles as a carefully calibrated credential: not bragging, not mystifying, just staking a claim to the mental toolkit that made his later work possible. Knowles, a chemist who helped pioneer asymmetric catalysis, isn’t selling genius so much as describing an orientation toward the world: problems are meant to be formalized, measured, solved.
The wording matters. "Particularly" is a softener, a scientist’s adverb that keeps the ego in check. It signals selection rather than superiority: among many traits, these were the ones that clicked. That restraint is part of the subtext of 20th-century American science culture, where accomplishment was often narrated as competence and persistence instead of charisma. You can hear an older professional ethic in it: the work should outshine the worker.
Context adds another layer. Born in 1917, Knowles came of age when chemistry was rapidly industrializing and wartime research was reshaping careers. To say you were good at math and science in that era is also to point to a passport into institutions and labs that increasingly ran on quantitative thinking. The line quietly naturalizes a pathway: aptitude leads to training; training leads to discovery.
It also functions as an implicit rebuke to romantic myths of inspiration. For a scientist, talent is framed less as a lightning bolt than as early evidence of fit. The sentence is unflashy by design, and that’s why it lands: it treats excellence as something you grow into, not something you perform.
The wording matters. "Particularly" is a softener, a scientist’s adverb that keeps the ego in check. It signals selection rather than superiority: among many traits, these were the ones that clicked. That restraint is part of the subtext of 20th-century American science culture, where accomplishment was often narrated as competence and persistence instead of charisma. You can hear an older professional ethic in it: the work should outshine the worker.
Context adds another layer. Born in 1917, Knowles came of age when chemistry was rapidly industrializing and wartime research was reshaping careers. To say you were good at math and science in that era is also to point to a passport into institutions and labs that increasingly ran on quantitative thinking. The line quietly naturalizes a pathway: aptitude leads to training; training leads to discovery.
It also functions as an implicit rebuke to romantic myths of inspiration. For a scientist, talent is framed less as a lightning bolt than as early evidence of fit. The sentence is unflashy by design, and that’s why it lands: it treats excellence as something you grow into, not something you perform.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
