"I was privileged to serve as a judge"
About this Quote
Privilege is doing a lot of legal work here. When Kenneth Starr says, "I was privileged to serve as a judge", he isn't just offering a polite valediction; he's placing his authority inside a moral frame. "Privileged" recasts public power as a kind of gift, suggesting humility while quietly reaffirming status. It's the kind of phrase that sounds self-effacing but actually stabilizes the speaker's legitimacy: I belonged there, I earned (or was granted) entry to the temple.
Coming from Starr, the word carries extra resonance. He lived at the fault line where law becomes national spectacle, most famously as independent counsel during the Clinton investigation, and later in high-profile institutional roles. In that universe, "service" is never only service. It's reputation management. It's an appeal to the judiciary's sacred aura at a time when courts are treated like political weather systems: predictable by ideology, contested by outcome.
The intent is to present judging as vocation rather than leverage. The subtext is a plea for a certain reading of his career: see the jurist, not the partisan; the steward, not the operator. The line is also strategically vague. It names no cases, no controversies, no accountability. That vagueness is the point. It asks the audience to fill in the blank with dignity and restraint, to remember the robe rather than the headlines.
In a culture suspicious of institutions, the sentence tries to launder authority through gratitude, turning power into something almost devotional.
Coming from Starr, the word carries extra resonance. He lived at the fault line where law becomes national spectacle, most famously as independent counsel during the Clinton investigation, and later in high-profile institutional roles. In that universe, "service" is never only service. It's reputation management. It's an appeal to the judiciary's sacred aura at a time when courts are treated like political weather systems: predictable by ideology, contested by outcome.
The intent is to present judging as vocation rather than leverage. The subtext is a plea for a certain reading of his career: see the jurist, not the partisan; the steward, not the operator. The line is also strategically vague. It names no cases, no controversies, no accountability. That vagueness is the point. It asks the audience to fill in the blank with dignity and restraint, to remember the robe rather than the headlines.
In a culture suspicious of institutions, the sentence tries to launder authority through gratitude, turning power into something almost devotional.
Quote Details
| Topic | Career |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List







