"I was very limited in what I could do with flying saucers, because they're just a metal disc. I had to try and put character in as if they were intelligently guided"
About this Quote
A flying saucer should be the least expressive object imaginable: a smooth metal plate with no face, no joints, no obvious “performance.” Ray Harryhausen’s complaint is really a declaration of faith in animation as acting. He isn’t talking about mechanics; he’s talking about personality. The saucer, in his hands, has to feel like a thinking adversary, not a prop pulled on wires. That’s the intent: to turn hardware into behavior.
The subtext is a quiet flex against the limits of mid-century effects. In the 1950s and ’60s, sci-fi often treated UFOs as icons - graphic symbols of the future hovering above cardboard sets. Harryhausen, coming from stop-motion’s tactile tradition, wants the opposite: specificity. “Intelligently guided” is a narrative demand as much as a technical one. If the audience senses intention - a pause before a strike, a predatory glide, a feint - they’ll project mind and menace onto the blank disc. Without that, the saucer is just geometry, and the scene turns into a demo reel.
Context matters: Harryhausen built wonder in an era before digital cheats could add micro-movements or procedural “life” in post. His creatures succeeded because they seemed to make choices, not just motions. Applying that philosophy to a saucer reveals his broader aesthetic: spectacle is cheap unless it carries character. Even the most sterile symbol of the Space Age has to be animated like it wants something. That’s how you make audiences feel watched, hunted, or awed - not by what the object is, but by how it behaves.
The subtext is a quiet flex against the limits of mid-century effects. In the 1950s and ’60s, sci-fi often treated UFOs as icons - graphic symbols of the future hovering above cardboard sets. Harryhausen, coming from stop-motion’s tactile tradition, wants the opposite: specificity. “Intelligently guided” is a narrative demand as much as a technical one. If the audience senses intention - a pause before a strike, a predatory glide, a feint - they’ll project mind and menace onto the blank disc. Without that, the saucer is just geometry, and the scene turns into a demo reel.
Context matters: Harryhausen built wonder in an era before digital cheats could add micro-movements or procedural “life” in post. His creatures succeeded because they seemed to make choices, not just motions. Applying that philosophy to a saucer reveals his broader aesthetic: spectacle is cheap unless it carries character. Even the most sterile symbol of the Space Age has to be animated like it wants something. That’s how you make audiences feel watched, hunted, or awed - not by what the object is, but by how it behaves.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ray
Add to List






