"I went into this job to do plays, but that's here for 10 weeks, and the rest of the year I do a lot of other things-the administrative work of planning, reading plays"
About this Quote
There is a quiet disillusionment tucked inside Ritchie’s plainspoken math: ten weeks of the thing he came for, forty-two weeks of everything else. The line lands because it refuses melodrama. No grand complaint, no romantic spiel about “the arts.” Just a blunt inventory of time that exposes how cultural work actually functions: the visible product is the smallest slice; the infrastructure is the job.
Ritchie’s intent feels less like self-pity than disclosure. He’s puncturing the audience’s fantasy that a director’s life is rehearsal rooms and opening nights. Instead, it’s planning meetings, budgets, calendars, grant logic, committee diplomacy, and the endless triage of “reading plays” that is both artistic nourishment and administrative pipeline management. That hyphenated list - “planning, reading plays” - is telling: even the creative act of reading is framed as managerial due diligence, a form of institutional intake.
The subtext is a tension between vocation and role. He “went into this job” to make art, but the job turned him into a custodian of an organization. That’s not a personal failing; it’s the structure of theatre as an institution that must survive year-round on fundraising cycles and programming bets. Ritchie is also signaling professionalism: the director as someone who builds conditions for work, not just the work itself.
Contextually, it echoes a broader late-20th-century shift where arts leaders became hybrid figures - part artist, part bureaucrat - as cultural organizations professionalized and scarcity demanded constant justification. The ache is real, but the sharper point is systemic: art doesn’t just happen; it’s administered into existence.
Ritchie’s intent feels less like self-pity than disclosure. He’s puncturing the audience’s fantasy that a director’s life is rehearsal rooms and opening nights. Instead, it’s planning meetings, budgets, calendars, grant logic, committee diplomacy, and the endless triage of “reading plays” that is both artistic nourishment and administrative pipeline management. That hyphenated list - “planning, reading plays” - is telling: even the creative act of reading is framed as managerial due diligence, a form of institutional intake.
The subtext is a tension between vocation and role. He “went into this job” to make art, but the job turned him into a custodian of an organization. That’s not a personal failing; it’s the structure of theatre as an institution that must survive year-round on fundraising cycles and programming bets. Ritchie is also signaling professionalism: the director as someone who builds conditions for work, not just the work itself.
Contextually, it echoes a broader late-20th-century shift where arts leaders became hybrid figures - part artist, part bureaucrat - as cultural organizations professionalized and scarcity demanded constant justification. The ache is real, but the sharper point is systemic: art doesn’t just happen; it’s administered into existence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List

