"I wonder how many people would have thought at the end of World War II that the capitalist system would be one that was meeting the challenges and making things better for people as we approach the 21st century"
About this Quote
There is a quiet victory lap embedded in Weill's "I wonder". Posed as a musing, it functions like a verdict: capitalism, once presumed brittle or morally compromised after the Depression and two world wars, has supposedly proved itself by history's scoreboard. Coming from a titan of finance, the sentence reads less like curiosity than like a permission structure for the late-20th-century order that benefited people like him: deregulation, global capital flows, and the idea that markets don't just allocate wealth but legitimize it.
The context matters. At the end of World War II, many elites treated capitalism as a system that needed heavy scaffolding to survive: welfare states, strong unions, industrial policy, the Bretton Woods architecture. Capitalism "meeting the challenges" was not the natural state of things; it was the result of deliberate constraints. Weill's framing skips that. It compresses a messy postwar bargain into a clean narrative of capitalism's resilience, as if the system won on its own merits rather than through the rules governments wrote for it.
Subtext: the rival is not merely Soviet communism, but the broader mid-century suspicion that markets require democratic taming to be humane. By the time he gestures toward the 21st century, he's capturing a specific cultural moment: the post-Cold War confidence that finance and technology had solved progress. The line is persuasive because it asks readers to remember uncertainty, then invites them to share his relief that the "right" system prevailed - without naming who paid the costs along the way.
The context matters. At the end of World War II, many elites treated capitalism as a system that needed heavy scaffolding to survive: welfare states, strong unions, industrial policy, the Bretton Woods architecture. Capitalism "meeting the challenges" was not the natural state of things; it was the result of deliberate constraints. Weill's framing skips that. It compresses a messy postwar bargain into a clean narrative of capitalism's resilience, as if the system won on its own merits rather than through the rules governments wrote for it.
Subtext: the rival is not merely Soviet communism, but the broader mid-century suspicion that markets require democratic taming to be humane. By the time he gestures toward the 21st century, he's capturing a specific cultural moment: the post-Cold War confidence that finance and technology had solved progress. The line is persuasive because it asks readers to remember uncertainty, then invites them to share his relief that the "right" system prevailed - without naming who paid the costs along the way.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sanford
Add to List
