"I won't say that the papers misquote me, but I sometimes wonder where Christianity would be today if some of those reporters had been Matthew, Mark, Luke and John"
About this Quote
Goldwater’s line is a politician’s complaint about the press, sharpened into a theological thought experiment. He opens with a lawyerly feint - “I won’t say” - the kind of denial that plants the accusation more effectively than stating it outright. Then he pivots to a joke with teeth: imagine the foundational story of Western religion being filtered through deadline pressure, selective quotation, and the appetite for a cleaner narrative than real life provides.
The intent is defensive, but not self-pitying. Goldwater isn’t begging for sympathy; he’s indicting mediation itself. By invoking the Gospel writers, he lifts a newsroom grievance into the realm of canon: if reporters can distort a senator today, what would they do with the Sermon on the Mount? The subtext is a warning about how institutions that claim to “report” reality also manufacture it - and how easily public memory becomes a product of edit choices, framing, and repetition.
Context matters: Goldwater came up in an era when national media power was consolidating, and he was frequently caricatured as the dangerous radical of 1964. The jab at journalists is also a jab at the moral authority that accrues to those who narrate events. It’s slyly anti-clerical in its own way, too: by comparing reporters to evangelists, he suggests that even sacred texts are not immune to human agendas.
The wit lands because it’s disproportionate on purpose: a small political grievance inflated to cosmic scale, revealing the paranoia - and the accuracy - that comes with being defined by someone else’s headline.
The intent is defensive, but not self-pitying. Goldwater isn’t begging for sympathy; he’s indicting mediation itself. By invoking the Gospel writers, he lifts a newsroom grievance into the realm of canon: if reporters can distort a senator today, what would they do with the Sermon on the Mount? The subtext is a warning about how institutions that claim to “report” reality also manufacture it - and how easily public memory becomes a product of edit choices, framing, and repetition.
Context matters: Goldwater came up in an era when national media power was consolidating, and he was frequently caricatured as the dangerous radical of 1964. The jab at journalists is also a jab at the moral authority that accrues to those who narrate events. It’s slyly anti-clerical in its own way, too: by comparing reporters to evangelists, he suggests that even sacred texts are not immune to human agendas.
The wit lands because it’s disproportionate on purpose: a small political grievance inflated to cosmic scale, revealing the paranoia - and the accuracy - that comes with being defined by someone else’s headline.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barry
Add to List






