"I worked with the March of Dimes to enact legislation for a national birth defects prevention program to provide surveillance, research and preventive services aimed at reducing the rate of birth defects"
About this Quote
Policy doesn’t often arrive dressed as a moral crusade; it shows up as a checklist: surveillance, research, preventive services. Solomon Ortiz’s line works because it embraces that bureaucratic bluntness and turns it into credibility. He’s not selling inspiration, he’s selling infrastructure - the unglamorous machinery that makes public health real. The specificity is the point: “national,” “legislation,” “program.” Each word signals scale, permanence, and a preference for systems over sentiment.
The partnership with the March of Dimes quietly does two jobs at once. It borrows a trusted brand in maternal and infant health, and it positions Ortiz as a legislator who can translate advocacy into statute. That’s an important subtext in an era when politicians are often accused of performative concern: he’s implying measurable follow-through. “Enact legislation” is a flex of competence, but framed as service rather than power.
Context matters: the March of Dimes evolved from fighting polio to tackling birth defects, and “prevention” became the new frontier - less about heroic cures and more about monitoring, data, and early intervention. Ortiz’s emphasis on “surveillance” signals modern public health’s slightly uncomfortable truth: you can’t prevent what you don’t count. It’s an admission that the state has to watch in order to protect, and that prevention is political - because it requires funding, coordination, and patience.
Even the close - “reducing the rate” - dodges absolutes. It’s pragmatic, incremental, and built for accountability. The intent isn’t to promise miracles; it’s to normalize prevention as a national obligation.
The partnership with the March of Dimes quietly does two jobs at once. It borrows a trusted brand in maternal and infant health, and it positions Ortiz as a legislator who can translate advocacy into statute. That’s an important subtext in an era when politicians are often accused of performative concern: he’s implying measurable follow-through. “Enact legislation” is a flex of competence, but framed as service rather than power.
Context matters: the March of Dimes evolved from fighting polio to tackling birth defects, and “prevention” became the new frontier - less about heroic cures and more about monitoring, data, and early intervention. Ortiz’s emphasis on “surveillance” signals modern public health’s slightly uncomfortable truth: you can’t prevent what you don’t count. It’s an admission that the state has to watch in order to protect, and that prevention is political - because it requires funding, coordination, and patience.
Even the close - “reducing the rate” - dodges absolutes. It’s pragmatic, incremental, and built for accountability. The intent isn’t to promise miracles; it’s to normalize prevention as a national obligation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Solomon
Add to List



