"I would say that IQ is the strongest predictor of which field you can get into and hold a job in, whether you can be an accountant, lawyer or nurse, for example"
About this Quote
Goleman’s line reads like a pointed corrective to the feel-good overreach that followed his own popularization of “emotional intelligence.” Beneath the measured phrasing (“I would say”) is a boundary-setting move: whatever we want to believe about grit, charisma, or EQ, cognitive ability still functions as a gatekeeper in modern credentialed work. The examples aren’t glamorous on purpose. Accountant, lawyer, nurse: jobs defined by sustained attention, rule-based reasoning, licensing exams, and error costs. He’s arguing for a baseline competence threshold, not genius, and he’s doing it with occupations that signal social necessity rather than elite mystique.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the meritocracy’s favorite loophole: the idea that personality can substitute for aptitude. Goleman doesn’t deny that social skills matter; he’s narrowing the claim to entry and persistence. “Get into and hold a job” frames IQ as both admissions ticket and stamina test, implying that the real divide isn’t just who gets hired but who can reliably perform without constant scaffolding.
Context matters: Goleman’s career sits inside decades of workplace psychology being translated into self-help and HR doctrine, often with an optimistic, democratizing sheen. This quote reins that in. It acknowledges structural reality without celebrating it, and it subtly warns that corporate culture’s obsession with “soft skills” can become a comforting distraction from harder questions about training, selection, and the unequal distribution of cognitive resources that institutions quietly depend on.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to the meritocracy’s favorite loophole: the idea that personality can substitute for aptitude. Goleman doesn’t deny that social skills matter; he’s narrowing the claim to entry and persistence. “Get into and hold a job” frames IQ as both admissions ticket and stamina test, implying that the real divide isn’t just who gets hired but who can reliably perform without constant scaffolding.
Context matters: Goleman’s career sits inside decades of workplace psychology being translated into self-help and HR doctrine, often with an optimistic, democratizing sheen. This quote reins that in. It acknowledges structural reality without celebrating it, and it subtly warns that corporate culture’s obsession with “soft skills” can become a comforting distraction from harder questions about training, selection, and the unequal distribution of cognitive resources that institutions quietly depend on.
Quote Details
| Topic | Career |
|---|
More Quotes by Daniel
Add to List






