"I would think twice about designing stuff for which there was no need and which didn't endure"
About this Quote
The two criteria he pairs - need and endurance - are doing heavy cultural work. “Need” pushes back on consumer culture’s favorite trick: manufacturing desire and calling it necessity. “Endure” is the moral amplifier, implying responsibility across time. If the object doesn’t last, it doesn’t just fail aesthetically; it fails socially. It externalizes its costs onto everyone else: landfill, replacement cycles, the low-grade stress of living among disposable things.
Day’s background as a journalist matters here. Journalists are trained to ask the brutal question: what is this for, and who benefits? That newsroom instinct translates into a design philosophy skeptical of hype and allergic to the empty press-release promise. The line also reads as a late-20th-century corrective, emerging as mass production, planned obsolescence, and branding turned objects into fast-moving narratives. Day isn’t romanticizing the past; he’s insisting that good making should survive both fashion and scrutiny. The real subtext: if it can’t justify itself in use and in time, it probably shouldn’t exist.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Day, Robin. (2026, January 18). I would think twice about designing stuff for which there was no need and which didn't endure. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-would-think-twice-about-designing-stuff-for-6291/
Chicago Style
Day, Robin. "I would think twice about designing stuff for which there was no need and which didn't endure." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-would-think-twice-about-designing-stuff-for-6291/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I would think twice about designing stuff for which there was no need and which didn't endure." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-would-think-twice-about-designing-stuff-for-6291/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.






