"I write for an audience that likes what I like, reads what I read, thinks about the things I think about. In many ways, this puts me in opposition to the people who go to the theater generally"
About this Quote
Bogosian is admitting, with a kind of street-smart candor, that he’s not auditioning for mass approval; he’s building a room and inviting his own people into it. The first sentence is almost disarmingly circular: I like what I like; you like what I like. It reads like a shrug, but it’s also a mission statement. He’s describing an audience not as a demographic but as a shared nervous system, a community formed by taste, suspicion, and appetite for certain kinds of stories.
Then comes the twist: “this puts me in opposition” to typical theatergoers. That word “opposition” matters. It reframes the theater not as a neutral cultural space but as contested territory, with norms and gatekeepers. Bogosian’s career context makes the line land harder: a downtown New York monologist and actor known for abrasive, fast-talking characters, social decay, and moral unease. His work has often been a rebuttal to the idea of theater as polite uplift for the well-heeled subscriber crowd.
The subtext is equal parts critique and survival strategy. He’s implying that mainstream theater audiences arrive expecting reassurance: recognizable prestige, tasteful discomfort, a night that still flatters their self-image. Bogosian isn’t offering that contract. He writes toward a smaller, more aligned audience because that’s where risk becomes possible and where antagonism can be productive rather than alienating. It’s not elitism; it’s specificity as an engine. In a marketplace that rewards consensus, he’s arguing that friction is a kind of fidelity.
Then comes the twist: “this puts me in opposition” to typical theatergoers. That word “opposition” matters. It reframes the theater not as a neutral cultural space but as contested territory, with norms and gatekeepers. Bogosian’s career context makes the line land harder: a downtown New York monologist and actor known for abrasive, fast-talking characters, social decay, and moral unease. His work has often been a rebuttal to the idea of theater as polite uplift for the well-heeled subscriber crowd.
The subtext is equal parts critique and survival strategy. He’s implying that mainstream theater audiences arrive expecting reassurance: recognizable prestige, tasteful discomfort, a night that still flatters their self-image. Bogosian isn’t offering that contract. He writes toward a smaller, more aligned audience because that’s where risk becomes possible and where antagonism can be productive rather than alienating. It’s not elitism; it’s specificity as an engine. In a marketplace that rewards consensus, he’s arguing that friction is a kind of fidelity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Eric
Add to List






