"I'd love to see the rushes but it's just not allowed because directors and also a lot of actors feel that if they see their work, and the director likes what they're doing, the actor might try to correct their mistakes"
About this Quote
You can hear the bruises in this one: a working actor admitting that the set is less a creative commune than a controlled ecosystem. Haim is talking about rushes dailies, the raw footage that would let performers calibrate their choices in real time. His “I’d love to see” lands as both curiosity and quiet protest, because the denial isn’t logistical; it’s political. The gatekeeping is framed as paternalism: directors (and “also a lot of actors”) claim they’re protecting performances from self-conscious tinkering. But the subtext is about authority and fear - fear that transparency would redistribute power.
Haim’s phrasing is revealingly skewed toward the director’s comfort: “if the director likes what they’re doing,” the actor might “correct their mistakes.” That’s a paradox on purpose. If the director likes it, why call it a mistake? Because the “mistake” isn’t necessarily artistic; it’s deviation from the actor’s own idealized self-image. Haim is pointing at the trap of watching yourself: you stop acting and start managing. Yet he also implies something sharper - that the industry prefers actors slightly in the dark, dependent on approval, easier to steer and easier to blame when the final cut doesn’t flatter them.
Coming from Haim, a former teen star who lived through Hollywood’s machinery at full speed, the line reads as insider realism. It’s not a romantic argument about process; it’s an X-ray of how performance, insecurity, and hierarchy keep each other in business.
Haim’s phrasing is revealingly skewed toward the director’s comfort: “if the director likes what they’re doing,” the actor might “correct their mistakes.” That’s a paradox on purpose. If the director likes it, why call it a mistake? Because the “mistake” isn’t necessarily artistic; it’s deviation from the actor’s own idealized self-image. Haim is pointing at the trap of watching yourself: you stop acting and start managing. Yet he also implies something sharper - that the industry prefers actors slightly in the dark, dependent on approval, easier to steer and easier to blame when the final cut doesn’t flatter them.
Coming from Haim, a former teen star who lived through Hollywood’s machinery at full speed, the line reads as insider realism. It’s not a romantic argument about process; it’s an X-ray of how performance, insecurity, and hierarchy keep each other in business.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Corey
Add to List




