"Idealism increases in direct proportion to one's distance from the problem"
About this Quote
Idealism is easiest when it costs you nothing, and Galsworthy has the decency to phrase that accusation as a neat little law of physics. The line works because it flatters and indicts at the same time: it sounds like a calm observation, but it’s really a moral X-ray. The farther you are from the mess - the budget meeting, the sickbed, the factory floor, the courtroom - the purer your principles can stay. Up close, ideals collide with rent, fatigue, compromise, and the stubborn fact that other people also have needs.
Galsworthy’s subtext is not that ideals are bad, but that disembodied ideals are suspicious. Distance doesn’t just remove inconvenience; it removes accountability. That’s why the sentence has bite in a society stratified by class and comfort, the world Galsworthy chronicled: well-positioned observers can afford sweeping judgments precisely because they’ll never be forced to implement them. His fiction, especially in The Forsyte Saga, keeps returning to the way moral postures harden into property - respectable, inherited, and insulated from consequences.
The intent is corrective. He’s puncturing the performative purity that arises when you can admire your own stance more than you have to test it. Read now, it lands as a critique of armchair politics, corporate mission statements, and online moral theater: the cleanest solutions tend to come from people least likely to be splashed by the problem. The line doesn’t ask you to abandon idealism; it asks you to pay the price of proximity.
Galsworthy’s subtext is not that ideals are bad, but that disembodied ideals are suspicious. Distance doesn’t just remove inconvenience; it removes accountability. That’s why the sentence has bite in a society stratified by class and comfort, the world Galsworthy chronicled: well-positioned observers can afford sweeping judgments precisely because they’ll never be forced to implement them. His fiction, especially in The Forsyte Saga, keeps returning to the way moral postures harden into property - respectable, inherited, and insulated from consequences.
The intent is corrective. He’s puncturing the performative purity that arises when you can admire your own stance more than you have to test it. Read now, it lands as a critique of armchair politics, corporate mission statements, and online moral theater: the cleanest solutions tend to come from people least likely to be splashed by the problem. The line doesn’t ask you to abandon idealism; it asks you to pay the price of proximity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List






