"Ideas came with explosive immediacy, like an instant birth. Human thought is like a monstrous pendulum; it keeps swinging from one extreme to the other"
About this Quote
Field’s image of ideas arriving “with explosive immediacy” treats inspiration less like careful carpentry and more like a sudden bodily event: “an instant birth.” It’s a deliberately visceral metaphor from a poet who made his living turning quick, bright observations into public-facing verse. The phrasing carries a double charge. Birth suggests creation, promise, and inevitability; “explosive” suggests danger, mess, and collateral damage. He’s praising the shock of insight while warning that what arrives fast can arrive unfiltered.
Then he widens the frame into cultural diagnosis: “Human thought is like a monstrous pendulum.” The pendulum is an old symbol of regularity and predictability, but Field corrupts it with “monstrous,” implying not just motion but scale and menace. Thought, in this view, isn’t a dignified march toward truth; it’s a lurching apparatus, a physics demo with political consequences. The swing “from one extreme to the other” isn’t merely personal moodiness; it’s a critique of public opinion, aesthetic fashion, and moral certainty - the way societies overcorrect, tire of nuance, and confuse reversal with progress.
Context matters: late-19th-century America was a boom time for mass newspapers, rapid social change, and ideological churn. Field, a newspaper man as well as a poet, watched ideas circulate at speed, hardening into fervor just as quickly. The subtext is skepticism toward the era’s faith in rational advancement: if thought behaves like a pendulum, the problem isn’t ignorance alone. It’s our appetite for extremes, and the intoxicating moment when an “instant birth” feels like destiny.
Then he widens the frame into cultural diagnosis: “Human thought is like a monstrous pendulum.” The pendulum is an old symbol of regularity and predictability, but Field corrupts it with “monstrous,” implying not just motion but scale and menace. Thought, in this view, isn’t a dignified march toward truth; it’s a lurching apparatus, a physics demo with political consequences. The swing “from one extreme to the other” isn’t merely personal moodiness; it’s a critique of public opinion, aesthetic fashion, and moral certainty - the way societies overcorrect, tire of nuance, and confuse reversal with progress.
Context matters: late-19th-century America was a boom time for mass newspapers, rapid social change, and ideological churn. Field, a newspaper man as well as a poet, watched ideas circulate at speed, hardening into fervor just as quickly. The subtext is skepticism toward the era’s faith in rational advancement: if thought behaves like a pendulum, the problem isn’t ignorance alone. It’s our appetite for extremes, and the intoxicating moment when an “instant birth” feels like destiny.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Eugene
Add to List









