"If a budget is designed to show our values, it's clear where the majority stands: against opportunity, against education, and against America's hard-working, tax-paying middle class"
About this Quote
Budgets are supposed to be boring spreadsheets; Tauscher turns one into a moral X-ray. The opening move - "If a budget is designed to show our values" - reframes a technical argument as a character test. She’s not debating line items. She’s indicting priorities, dragging the fight from the committee room to the terrain of identity: who are we, and who do we leave behind?
The phrase "it’s clear where the majority stands" is the knife twist. It casts fiscal decisions as deliberate, not accidental - not unfortunate tradeoffs but chosen harms. That’s the subtext: stop pretending austerity is neutral. Someone benefits, someone pays, and the majority is owning the outcome. It also names a target without needing to: whoever holds power in that moment is morally exposed.
Her triad - "against opportunity, against education, and against America’s hard-working, tax-paying middle class" - is classic political rhetoric sharpened for maximum coalition-building. "Opportunity" is airy enough to include jobs, training, mobility. "Education" is a sacred cow across party lines, making opposition sound not just wrong but reckless. Then she lands on "hard-working, tax-paying" as a credibility shield: this isn’t a plea for the marginal; it’s a defense of the people politicians constantly claim to serve.
Context matters: this is mid-2000s/early-2010s Democratic messaging during bruising budget battles, when tax cuts, war spending, and deficit politics collided with domestic investment. Tauscher’s intent is to make budget cuts feel like a values betrayal, not an economic necessity - a charge designed to stick in the headlines long after the numbers blur.
The phrase "it’s clear where the majority stands" is the knife twist. It casts fiscal decisions as deliberate, not accidental - not unfortunate tradeoffs but chosen harms. That’s the subtext: stop pretending austerity is neutral. Someone benefits, someone pays, and the majority is owning the outcome. It also names a target without needing to: whoever holds power in that moment is morally exposed.
Her triad - "against opportunity, against education, and against America’s hard-working, tax-paying middle class" - is classic political rhetoric sharpened for maximum coalition-building. "Opportunity" is airy enough to include jobs, training, mobility. "Education" is a sacred cow across party lines, making opposition sound not just wrong but reckless. Then she lands on "hard-working, tax-paying" as a credibility shield: this isn’t a plea for the marginal; it’s a defense of the people politicians constantly claim to serve.
Context matters: this is mid-2000s/early-2010s Democratic messaging during bruising budget battles, when tax cuts, war spending, and deficit politics collided with domestic investment. Tauscher’s intent is to make budget cuts feel like a values betrayal, not an economic necessity - a charge designed to stick in the headlines long after the numbers blur.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ellen
Add to List
