"If a person is not willing to make a mistake, you're never going to do anything right"
About this Quote
Weill’s line has the blunt, boardroom clarity of someone who’s watched “playing it safe” quietly bankrupt good decisions. The phrasing is a trapdoor: it sounds like a warm poster about courage, then lands on a harder claim about competence. “Anything right” isn’t about moral virtue; it’s about execution in a world where outcomes are probabilistic and information is always incomplete. In Weill’s universe - finance, mergers, institutional power - perfectionism is just risk-aversion wearing a respectable suit.
The intent is managerial as much as inspirational. He’s licensing error as a cost of doing business, but also drawing a bright line between productive mistakes and the inert failure of never acting. The subtext: if you demand certainty, you’ll outsource judgment to consensus, lawyers, and process. You won’t be wrong, exactly - you’ll just be irrelevant. “Not willing” is key; it suggests a temperament problem, not an intelligence problem. This is a cultural critique of the cautious striver who wants upside without exposure.
Context matters because the speaker isn’t an artist romanticizing failure; he’s a businessman whose career was built on bold consolidation and high-stakes bets. Coming from that world, the quote doubles as a defense of aggressive leadership. It normalizes collateral damage - the missteps, layoffs, and miscalculations that get reframed later as “learning.” It also works rhetorically because it reverses the usual moral hierarchy: the careful person isn’t the responsible one; they’re the obstacle. In an economy that rewards decisive narratives, Weill is selling a philosophy of action that makes risk feel like professionalism.
The intent is managerial as much as inspirational. He’s licensing error as a cost of doing business, but also drawing a bright line between productive mistakes and the inert failure of never acting. The subtext: if you demand certainty, you’ll outsource judgment to consensus, lawyers, and process. You won’t be wrong, exactly - you’ll just be irrelevant. “Not willing” is key; it suggests a temperament problem, not an intelligence problem. This is a cultural critique of the cautious striver who wants upside without exposure.
Context matters because the speaker isn’t an artist romanticizing failure; he’s a businessman whose career was built on bold consolidation and high-stakes bets. Coming from that world, the quote doubles as a defense of aggressive leadership. It normalizes collateral damage - the missteps, layoffs, and miscalculations that get reframed later as “learning.” It also works rhetorically because it reverses the usual moral hierarchy: the careful person isn’t the responsible one; they’re the obstacle. In an economy that rewards decisive narratives, Weill is selling a philosophy of action that makes risk feel like professionalism.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning from Mistakes |
|---|
More Quotes by Sanford
Add to List






