"If all you're trying to do is essentially the same thing as your rivals, then it's unlikely that you'll be very successful"
About this Quote
Porter’s line lands like a polite reprimand to a business culture that fetishizes “best practices” and then wonders why everyone’s margins look the same. The intent is blunt: competition isn’t a race to do the identical thing slightly cheaper or slightly faster; it’s a choice to be meaningfully different. In Porter’s universe, imitation isn’t just uncreative, it’s strategically self-harming.
The subtext is where the knife turns. “Essentially the same thing” is a warning about the comforting laziness of benchmarking. Companies love rivals because rivals provide a ready-made syllabus: copy their features, mirror their pricing, adopt their metrics, hire their execs. You can feel the educator in him: he’s diagnosing a classroom of students all turning in the same essay and expecting extra credit for formatting.
Context matters because Porter helped define modern strategy in an era when many executives treated competition as operational optimization. His broader argument separates operational effectiveness (doing similar activities better) from strategy (doing different activities, or doing similar activities in different ways that fit together). The quote compresses that distinction into one sentence: if you’re playing the same game on the same field with the same rules, “success” becomes a brutal math problem of scale, cost, and endurance. The winners aren’t necessarily smarter; they’re often just bigger or luckier.
It works rhetorically because it replaces motivational mush with a constraint: uniqueness is not branding frosting, it’s the core variable. Porter isn’t urging originality for its own sake; he’s insisting that advantage is designed, not chased.
The subtext is where the knife turns. “Essentially the same thing” is a warning about the comforting laziness of benchmarking. Companies love rivals because rivals provide a ready-made syllabus: copy their features, mirror their pricing, adopt their metrics, hire their execs. You can feel the educator in him: he’s diagnosing a classroom of students all turning in the same essay and expecting extra credit for formatting.
Context matters because Porter helped define modern strategy in an era when many executives treated competition as operational optimization. His broader argument separates operational effectiveness (doing similar activities better) from strategy (doing different activities, or doing similar activities in different ways that fit together). The quote compresses that distinction into one sentence: if you’re playing the same game on the same field with the same rules, “success” becomes a brutal math problem of scale, cost, and endurance. The winners aren’t necessarily smarter; they’re often just bigger or luckier.
It works rhetorically because it replaces motivational mush with a constraint: uniqueness is not branding frosting, it’s the core variable. Porter isn’t urging originality for its own sake; he’s insisting that advantage is designed, not chased.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|---|
| Source | Michael E. Porter, "What Is Strategy?", Harvard Business Review, Nov–Dec 1996, pp. 61–78 (discussion on limits of imitating rivals and need for distinct strategic positioning). |
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List






