"If Bangladesh succumbs to the rule of one family, it would be a major step backward for the region"
About this Quote
Zia’s intent is opposition politics with a constitutional wrapper. By framing dynastic consolidation as a “step backward,” she casts herself as the guardian of democratic progression, even as Bangladesh’s party system has long been dominated by its own famous surnames. That irony is part of the power play: in South Asian politics, legitimacy is often inherited, so the attack isn’t on political lineage as such but on monopoly - the moment when a dynasty stops being a brand and starts behaving like a state.
The regional framing is the clincher. “For the region” recruits outside stakeholders - India, Western donors, multilateral lenders - by suggesting Bangladesh’s internal trajectory will ripple into security cooperation, trade corridors, and democratic norms. It’s a bid to make domestic power concentration everyone else’s problem, and to stigmatize any move toward one-family dominance as not merely undemocratic, but destabilizing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Zia, Khaleda. (2026, January 15). If Bangladesh succumbs to the rule of one family, it would be a major step backward for the region. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-bangladesh-succumbs-to-the-rule-of-one-family-173591/
Chicago Style
Zia, Khaleda. "If Bangladesh succumbs to the rule of one family, it would be a major step backward for the region." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-bangladesh-succumbs-to-the-rule-of-one-family-173591/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"If Bangladesh succumbs to the rule of one family, it would be a major step backward for the region." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/if-bangladesh-succumbs-to-the-rule-of-one-family-173591/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.




